History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
But Napoleon’s wrath so just, and apparently so dangerous, could not,
even in its first violence, overpower his early friendship. With a
kindness, the recollection of which must now pierce Marmont’s inmost
soul, twice, in the same letter, he desired that these questions
might not even be put to his unhappy lieutenant until his wounds
were cured and his health re-established. Nor was this generous
feeling shaken by the arrival of the king’s agent, colonel Desprez,
who reached Moscow the 18th of October, just after Murat had lost
a battle at the outposts and when all hopes of peace with Russia
were at an end. Joseph’s dispatches bitter against all the generals,
were especially so against Marmont and Soult; the former for having
lost the battle, the latter because of his resistance to the royal
plan. The recal of the duke of Dalmatia was demanded imperatively,
because he had written a letter to the emperor, extremely offensive
to the king; and it was also hinted, that Soult designed to make
himself king of Andalusia. Idle stories of that marshal’s ambition
seem always to have been resorted to, when his skilful plans were
beyond the military judgement of ordinary generals; but Marmont was
deeply sunk in culpable misfortune, and the king’s complaints against
him were not unjust. Napoleon had however then seen Wellington’s
dispatch, which was more favourable to the duke of Ragusa, than
Joseph’s report; for the latter was founded on a belief, that the
unfortunate general, knowing the army of the centre was close at
hand, would not wait for it; whereas the partidas had intercepted
so many of Joseph’s letters, it is doubtful if any reached Marmont
previous to the battle. It was in vain therefore, that Desprez
pressed the king’s discontent on the emperor; that great man, with
unerring sagacity, had already disentangled the truth, and Desprez
was thus roughly interrogated as to the conduct of his master.
Why was not the army of the centre in the field a month sooner to
succour Marmont? Why was the emperor’s example, when, in a like case,
he marched from Madrid against sir John Moore, forgotten? Why, after
the battle, was not the Duero passed, and the beaten troops rallied
on the army of the centre? Why were the passes of the Guadarama so
early abandoned? Why was the Tagus crossed so soon? Finally, why were
the stores and gun-carriages in the Retiro not burnt, the eagles and
the garrison carried off?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account