History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This comparison furnishes the proof of Wellington’s sagacity, when
he determined not to fight except at great advantage. The French
army, although surprised in the midst of an evolution and instantly
swept from the field, killed and wounded six thousand of the allies;
the eleventh and sixty-first regiments of the sixth division had
not together more than one hundred and sixty men and officers left
standing at the end of the battle; twice six thousand then would
have fallen in a more equal contest, the blow would have been less
decisive, and as Chauvel’s cavalry and the king’s army were both
at hand, a retreat into Portugal would probably have followed a
less perfect victory. Wherefore this battle ought not, and would
not have been fought, but for Marmont’s false movement on the 22d.
Yet it is certain that if Wellington had retired without fighting,
the murmurs of his army, already louder than was seemly, would have
been heard in England, and if an accidental shot had terminated his
career all would have terminated. The cortez, ripe for a change,
would have accepted the intrusive king, and the American war, just
declared against England, would have rendered the complicated affairs
of Portugal so extremely embarrassed that no new man could have
continued the contest. Then the cries of disappointed politicians
would have been raised. Wellington, it would have been said,
Wellington, desponding, and distrusting his brave troops, dared not
venture a battle on even terms, hence these misfortunes! His name
would have been made, as sir John Moore’s was, a butt for the malice
and falsehood of faction, and his military genius would have been
measured by the ignorance of his detractors.
[Sidenote: Appendix, Nos. 19, 20.]
8º. In the battle Marmont had about forty-two thousand sabres and
bayonets; Wellington who had received some detachments on the
19th had above forty-six thousand, but the excess was principally
Spanish. The French had seventy-four guns, the allies, including a
Spanish battery, had only sixty pieces. Thus, Marmont, over-matched
in cavalry and infantry, was superior in artillery, and the fight
would have been most bloody, if the generals had been equal, for
courage and strength were in even balance until Wellington’s genius
struck the beam. Scarcely can a fault be detected in his conduct. It
might indeed be asked why the cavalry reserves were not, after Le
Marchant’s charge, brought up closer to sustain the fourth, fifth,
and sixth divisions and to keep off Boyer’s dragoons, but it would
seem ill to cavil at an action which was described at the time by
a French officer, as the “_beating of forty thousand men in forty
minutes_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account