History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The Emperor indeed with that wonderful intellectual activity and
energy which made him the foremost man of the world, had raised a
fresh army and prepared once more to march into the heart of Germany,
yet to do this he was forced to withdraw such numbers of old soldiers
from Spain that the French army could no longer hope permanently to
act on the offensive. This stayed the Peninsula cause upon the very
brink of a precipice, for in that very curious, useful, and authentic
work, called “_Bourrienne and his errors_,” it appears that early in
1813, the ever factious Conde de Montijo, then a general in Elio’s
army, had secretly made proposals to pass over, with the forces under
his command, to the king; and soon afterwards the whole army of Del
Parque, having advanced into La Mancha, made offers of the same
nature.
They were actually in negociation with Joseph, when the emperor’s
orders obliged the French army to abandon Madrid, and take up the
line of the Duero. Then the Spaniards advertised of the French
weakness, feared to continue their negociations, Wellington soon
afterwards advanced, and as this feeling in favour of the intrusive
monarch was certainly not general, the resistance to the invaders
revived with the successes of the British general. But if instead
of diminishing his forces, Napoleon, victorious in Russia, had
strengthened them, this defection would certainly have taken place,
and would probably have been followed by others. The king at the
head of a Spanish army would then have reconquered Andalusia,
Wellington would have been confined to the defence of Portugal, and
it is scarcely to be supposed that England would have purchased the
independence of that country with her own permanent ruin.
This conspiracy is not related by me with entire confidence, because
no trace of the transaction is to be found in the correspondence of
the king taken at Vittoria. Nevertheless there are abundant proofs
that the work called “_Bourrienne and his errors_,” inasmuch as it
relates to Joseph’s transactions in Spain, is accurately compiled
from that monarch’s correspondence. Many of his papers taken at
Vittoria were lost or abstracted at the time, and as in a case
involving so many persons’ lives, he would probably have destroyed
the proofs of a conspiracy which had failed, there seems little
reason to doubt that the general fact is correct. Napoleon also in
his memoirs, speaks of secret negociations with the Cortez about this
time, and his testimony is corroborated by the correspondence of the
British embassy at Cadiz, and by the continued intrigues against the
British influence. The next chapter will show that the policy of
Spain was not the only source of uneasiness to Lord Wellington.
CHAPTER II.
[Sidenote: 1813.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account