History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Lord Wellington was greatly displeased that this false alarm,
given by Erskine, should have rendered the success incomplete; yet
he avoided any public expression of discontent, lest the enemy,
who had no apparent interest in preserving the post of Mirabete,
should be led to keep it, and so embarrass the allies when their
operations required a restoration of the bridge of Almaraz. To the
ministers however he complained, that his generals, stout in action,
personally, as the poorest soldiers, were commonly so overwhelmed
with the fear of responsibility when left to themselves, that the
slightest movement of the enemy deprived them of their judgment, and
they spread unnecessary alarm far and wide. But instead of expressing
his surprise, he should rather have reflected on the cause of this
weakness. Every British officer of rank knew, that without powerful
interest, his future prospects, and his reputation for past services,
would have withered together under the first blight of misfortune;
that a selfish government would instantly offer him up, a victim to a
misjudging public and a ribald press with whom success is the only
criterion of merit. English generals are and must be prodigal of
their blood to gain a reputation, but they are necessarily timid in
command, when a single failure, even without a fault, consigns them
to an old age of shame and misery. It is however undeniable that sir
William Erskine was not an able officer.
On the other side the king was equally discontented with Soult,
whose refusal to reinforce Drouet, he thought had caused the loss of
Almaraz, and he affirmed that if Hill had been more enterprising, the
arsenal of Madrid might have fallen as well as the dépôt of Almaraz,
for he thought that general had brought up his whole corps instead of
a division only six thousand strong.
CHAPTER II.
[Sidenote: 1812. April.]
While the Anglo-British army was thus cleansing and strengthening
its position on the frontier of Portugal, the progress of the war
in other parts had not been so favourable to the common cause. It
has already been shewn that Gallicia, in the latter part of 1811,
suffered from discord, poverty, and ill success in the field; that
an extraordinary contribution imposed upon the province, had been
resisted by all classes, and especially at Coruña the seat of
Government; finally that the army torn by faction was become hateful
to the people. In this state of affairs Castaños having, at the
desire of lord Wellington, assumed the command, removed the seat of
Government to St. Jago, leaving the troops in the Bierzo under the
marquis of Portazgo.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account