History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This plan however demanded promptness and energy, and Murray
professed neither. The weather was so favourable, that a voyage
which might have consumed nine or ten days was performed in two,
the Spanish troops punctually effected their junction, the initial
operations were secured, Fort Balaguer fell, the French moved from
all sides to the succour of Taragona, the line of the Xucar was
weakened, the diversion was complete. In the night of the 12th the
bulk of Murray’s army was again afloat, a few hours would have
sufficed to embark the cavalry at the Col de Balaguer, and the whole
might have sailed for the city of Valencia, while Suchet’s advanced
guard was still on the hills above Monroig, and he, still uncertain
as to the fate of Taragona, one hundred and fifty miles from the
Xucar. In fine Murray had failed to attain the first object pointed
out by Wellington’s instructions, but the second was within his
reach; instead of grasping it he loitered about the Col de Balaguer,
and gave Suchet, as we shall find, time to reach Valencia again.
[Sidenote: Defence of sir J. Murray in Phillipart’s Military
Calendar.]
[Sidenote: See Plan, No. 1.]
Now whether the letter or the spirit of Wellington’s instructions
be considered, there was here a manifest dereliction on the part of
Murray. What was that officer’s defence? That no specific period
being named for his return to Valencia, he was entitled to exercise
his discretion! Did he then as an independent general perform any
useful or brilliant action to justify his delay? No! his tale was one
of loss and dishonour! The improvident arrangements for the siege of
San Felippe de Balaguer, and the unexpected fortune which saved him
from the shame of abandoning his guns there also have been noted;
and it has been shown, that when the gain of time was the great
element of success, he neither urged Copons to break up the roads,
nor pushed the siege of Taragona with vigour. The feeble formality of
this latter operation has indeed been imputed to the engineer major
Thackary, yet unjustly so. It was the part of that officer to form a
plan of attack agreeable to the rules of art, it might be a bold or a
cautious plan, and many persons did think Taragona was treated by him
with too much respect; but it was the part of the commander-in-chief,
to decide, if the general scheme of operations required a deviation
from the regular course. The untrammelled engineer could then have
displayed his genius. Sir John Murray made no sign. His instructions
and his ultimate views were withheld alike, from his naval colleague,
from his second in command, and from his quarter-master-general;
and while the last-named functionary was quite shut out from the
confidence of his commander, the admiral, and many others, both
of the army and navy, imagined him to be the secret author of the
proceedings which were hourly exciting their indignation. Murray
however declared on his trial, that he had rejected general Donkin’s
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account