History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Suchet pursuing his march came up with lord William about eight
o’clock. The latter retired skirmishing and with excellent order
beyond Villa Franca, followed by the French horsemen some of which
assailed his rear-guard while others edged to their right to secure
the communication with Decaen. The latter was looked for by both
parties with great anxiety, but he had been delayed by the resistance
of Manso and Eroles in the rugged country between Martorel and San
Sadurni. Suchet’s cavalry and artillery continued however to infest
the rear of the retreating army until it reached a deep baranco,
near the Venta de Monjos, where the passage being dangerous and
the French horseman importunate, that brave and honest soldier,
lord Frederick Bentinck, charged their right, and fighting hand
to hand with the enemy’s general Myers wounded him and overthrew
his light cavalry; they rallied upon their dragoons and advanced
again, endeavouring to turn the flank, but were stopped by the fire
of two guns which general Clinton opened upon them. Meanwhile the
cuirassiers, on the left, pressed the Brunswick hussars and menaced
the infantry yet they were finally checked by the fire of the tenth
regiment. This cavalry action was vigorous, the twentieth and the
Germans although few in numbers lost more than ninety men. The
baranco was however safely passed and about three o’clock the army
having reached Arbos the pursuit ceased. The Catalans meanwhile
had retreated towards Igualada and the Anglo-Sicilians retired to
Taragona.
It was now thought Suchet would make a movement to carry off the
garrisons of Lerida and Tortoza, but this did not happen, and lord
William went to Sicily, leaving the command of the army to sir
William Clinton.
OBSERVATIONS.
1º. Lord William Bentinck committed errors, yet he has been censured
without discrimination. “_He advanced rashly._” “_He was undecided._”
“_He exposed his advanced guard without support._” Such were the
opinions expressed at the time. Their justness may be disputed. His
first object was to retain all the French force in Catalonia; his
second, to profit from Suchet’s weakness if he detached largely. He
could do neither by remaining inactive on the barren hills behind
Hospitalet, because the Spaniards would have dispersed for want of
provisions and the siege of Tortoza was found to be impracticable.
It was therefore the part of a bold and skilful general to menace
his enemy, if he could be sure of retreating again without danger or
dishonour. The position at Villa Franca fulfilled this condition. It
was strong in itself and offensive; sir Edward Pellew’s fleet was
in movement to create diversions in Upper Catalonia, and all the
emissaries and Spanish correspondents concurred in declaring, though
falsely, that the French general had detached twelve thousand men.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account