History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Wellington having his battering train and stores about San
Sebastian, which was also nearer and more accessible to the enemy
than Pampeluna, made his army lean towards that side. His left
wing, including the army of siege, was twenty-one thousand strong
with singularly strong positions of defence, and the centre, about
twenty-four thousand strong, could in two marches unite with the left
wing to cover the siege or fall upon the flanks of an enemy advancing
by the high road of Irun; but three days or more were required by
those troops to concentrate for the security of the blockade on the
right. Soult however judged that no decisive result would attend a
direct movement upon San Sebastian; because Guipuscoa was exhausted
of provisions, and the centre of the allies could fall on his flank
before he reached Ernani, which, his attack in front failing, would
place him in a dangerous position. Moreover by means of his sea
communication he knew that San Sebastian was not in extremity; but he
had no communication with Pampeluna and feared its fall. Wherefore he
resolved to operate by his left.
Profiting by the roads leading to St. Jean Pied de Port, and covering
his movement by the Nivelle and Nive rivers and by the positions of
his centre, he hoped to gather on Wellington’s right quicker than
that general could gather to oppose him, and thus compensating by
numbers the disadvantage of assailing mountain positions force a way
to Pampeluna. That fortress once succoured, he designed to seize the
road of Irurzun, and keeping in mass either fall upon the separated
divisions of the centre in detail as they descended from the hills,
or operate on the rear of the force besieging San Sebastian, while
a corps of observation, which he proposed to leave on the Lower
Bidassoa, menaced it in front and followed it in retreat. The siege
of San Sebastian, the blockade of Pampeluna and probably that of
Santona, would be thus raised, and the French army united in an
abundant country, and its communication with Suchet secured, would
be free either to co-operate with that marshal or to press its own
attack.
In this view, and to mislead lord Wellington by vexing his right
simultaneously with the construction of the bridges against his
left, Soult wrote to general Paris, desiring him to march when time
suited from Jaca by the higher valleys towards Aviz or Sanguessa,
to drive the partizans from that side and join the left of the army
when it should have reached Pampeluna. Meanwhile Clauzel was directed
to repair the roads in his own front, to push the heads of his
columns towards the passes of Roncesvalles, and by sending a strong
detachment into the Val de Baygorry, towards the lateral pass of
Yspegui, to menace Hill’s flank which was at that pass, and the front
of Campbell’s brigade in the Alduides.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account