History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
This last-named marshal, being strongly posted, did not much expect
a front attack, but the augmentation of the allies on the side of
Roncesvalles and Maya gave him uneasiness, lest they should force him
to abandon his position by operating along the Nive river. To meet
this danger general Paris took post at Oleron in second line to Foy,
and the fortresses of St. Jean Pied de Port and Navareins were put in
a state of defence as pivots of operation on that side, while Bayonne
served a like purpose on the other flank of the army. But with great
diligence the French general fortified his line from the mouth of the
Bidassoa to the rocks of Mondarain and the Nive.
Lord Wellington, whose reasons for not invading France at this period
have been already noticed, and who had now little to fear from any
renewal of the French operations against his right wing, turned his
whole attention to the reduction of San Sebastian. In this object he
was however crossed in a manner to prove that the English ministers
were the very counterparts of the Spanish and Portuguese statesmen.
Lord Melville was at the head of the board of admiralty; under his
rule the navy of England for the first time met with disasters in
battle, and his neglect of the general’s demands for maritime aid
went nigh to fasten the like misfortunes upon the army. This neglect
combined with the cabinet scheme of employing lord Wellington in
Germany, would seem to prove that experience had taught the English
ministers nothing as to the nature of the Peninsular war, or that
elated with the array of sovereigns against Napoleon they were now
careless of a cause so mixed up with democracy. Still it would be
incredible that lord Melville, a man of ordinary capacity, should
have been suffered to retard the great designs and endanger the final
success of a general, whose sure judgement and extraordinary merit
were authenticated by exploits unparalleled in English warfare, if
lord Wellington’s correspondence and that of Mr. Stuart did not
establish the following facts.
1º. Desertion from the enemy was stopped, chiefly because the
Admiralty, of which lord Melville was the head, refused to let the
ships of war carry deserters or prisoners to England; they were thus
heaped up by hundreds at Lisbon and maltreated by the Portuguese
government, which checked all desire in the French troops to come
over.
2º. When the disputes with America commenced, Mr. Stuart’s efforts to
obtain flour for the army were most vexatiously thwarted by the board
of admiralty, which permitted if it did not encourage the English
ships of war to capture American vessels trading under the secret
licenses.
[Sidenote: Appendix, No. 1.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account