History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
7º. During the siege the sea communication with Bayonne was free.
“Any thing in the shape of a naval force,” said lord Wellington,
“would drive away sir George Collier’s squadron.” The garrison
received reinforcements artillery ammunition and all necessary stores
for its defence, sending away the sick and wounded men in empty
vessels. The Spanish general blockading Santona complained at the
same time that the exertions of his troops were useless, because the
French succoured the place by sea when they pleased; and after the
battle of Vittoria not less than five vessels laden with stores and
provisions, and one transport having British soldiers and clothing
on board, were taken by cruizers issuing out of that port. The great
advantage of attacking San Sebastian by water as well as by land was
foregone for want of naval means, and from the same cause British
soldiers were withdrawn from their own service to unload store-ships;
the gun-boats employed in the blockade were Spanish vessels manned by
Spanish soldiers withdrawn from the army, and the store-boats were
navigated by Spanish women.
8º. The coasting trade between Bordeaux and Bayonne being quite free,
the French, whose military means of transport had been so crippled
by their losses at Vittoria that they could scarcely have collected
magazines with land carriage only, received their supplies by
water, and were thus saved trouble and expense and the unpopularity
attending forced requisitions.
Between April and August, more than twenty applications and
remonstrances, were addressed by lord Wellington to the government
upon these points without producing the slightest attention to his
demands. Mr. Croker, the under-secretary of the Admiralty, of whose
conduct he particularly complained, was indeed permitted to write an
offensive official letter to him, but his demands and the dangers
to be apprehended from neglecting them were disregarded, and to
use his own words, “_since Great Britain had been a naval power a
British army had never before been left in such a situation at a most
important moment_.”
Nor is it easy to determine whether negligence and incapacity
or a grovelling sense of national honour prevailed most in the
cabinet, when we find this renowned general complaining that the
government, ignorant even to ridicule of military operations, seemed
to know nothing of the nature of the element with which England was
surrounded, and lord Melville so insensible to the glorious toils of
the Peninsula as to tell him that his army was the last thing to be
attended to.
RENEWED SIEGE OF SEBASTIAN.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account