History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
He was in no manner deceived as to his enemy’s superior strength of
position number and military confidence; but his former efforts on
the side of Pampeluna had interrupted the attack of San Sebastian,
and another offensive movement would necessarily produce a like
effect; wherefore he hoped by repeating the disturbance, as long as
a free intercourse by sea enabled him to reinforce and supply the
garrison, to render the siege a wasting operation for the allies. To
renew the movement against Pampeluna was most advantageous, but it
required fifty thousand infantry for the attack, and twenty thousand
as a corps of observation on the Lower Bidassoa, and he had not
such numbers to dispose of. The subsistence of his troops also was
uncertain, because the loss of all the military carriages at Vittoria
was still felt, and the resources of the country were reluctantly
yielded by the people. To act on the side of St. Jean Pied de Port
was therefore impracticable. And to attack the allies’ centre, at
Vera, Echallar, and the Bastan, was unpromising, seeing that two
mountain-chains were to be forced before the movement could seriously
affect lord Wellington: moreover, the ways being impracticable for
artillery, success if such should befall, would lead to no decisive
result. It only remained to attack the left of the allies by the
great road of Irun.
Against that quarter Soult could bring more than forty thousand
infantry, but the positions were of perilous strength. The Upper
Bidassoa was in Wellington’s power, because the light division,
occupying Vera and the heights of Santa Barbara on the right bank,
covered all the bridges; but the Lower Bidassoa flowing from Vera
with a bend to the left separated the hostile armies, and against
this front about nine miles wide Soult’s operations were necessarily
directed. On his right, that is to say, from the broken bridge of
Behobia in front of Irun to the sea, the river, broad and tidal,
offered no apparent facility for a passage; and between the fords
of Biriatu and those of Vera, a distance of three miles, there was
only the one passage of Andarlassa about two miles below Vera; along
this space also the banks of the river, steep craggy mountain ridges
without roads, forbade any great operations. Thus the points of
attack were restricted to Vera and the fords between Biriatu and the
broken bridge of Behobia.
[Sidenote: Plan 5.]
[Sidenote: Soult’s Official Correspondence, MSS.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account