History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Cassan’s object being merely to obtain better terms this order
remained dormant, and happily so, for the execution would never have
borne the test of public opinion. To destroy the works of Pampeluna
and break through the blockading force, as Brennier did at Almeida,
would have been a very noble exploit, and a useful one for the French
army if Soult’s plan of changing the theatre of war by descending
into Aragon had been followed. There could therefore be nothing
contrary to the laws of war in a resolute action of that nature.
On the other hand if the governor, having no chance whatever of
success, made a hopeless attempt the pretence for destroying a great
fortress belonging to the Spaniards and depriving the allies of the
fruits of their long blockade and glorious battles, the conquerors
might have justly exercised that severe but undoubted right of
war, refusing quarter to an enemy. But lord Wellington’s letter to
D’España involved another question, namely the putting of prisoners
to death. For the soldiers could not be decimated until captured,
and their crime would have been only obedience to orders in a matter
of which they dared not judge. This would have been quite contrary
to the usages of civilized nations, and the threat must undoubtedly
be considered only as a device to save the works of Pampeluna and to
avoid the odium of refusing quarter.
A few days longer the governor and garrison endured their distress
and then capitulated, having defended themselves more than four
months with great constancy. The officers and soldiers became
prisoners of war. The first were allowed to keep their arms and
baggage, the second their knapsacks, expressly on the ground that
they had treated the inhabitants well during the investment. This
compliment was honourable to both sides, but there was another
article, enforced by D’España without being accepted by the garrison,
for which it is difficult to assign any motive but the vindictive
ferocity of the Spanish character. No person of either sex was
permitted to follow the French troops, and women’s affections were
thus barbarously brought under the action of the sword.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account