History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
markets and of employment, the absence of ready money, the loss of
profit, public and private, occasioned by the departure of the army
while the contributions and other exactions remained the same, galled
all classes, and the whole nation was ready to shake off the burthen
of gratitude.
In this state of feeling emissaries were employed to promulgate
in various directions tales, some true some false, of the
disorders perpetrated by the military detachments on the lines of
communication, adding that they were the result of secret orders from
Wellington to satisfy his personal hatred of Portugal! At the same
time discourses and writings against the British influence abounded
in Lisbon and at Rio Janeiro, and were re-echoed or surpassed by the
London newspapers, whose statements overflowing of falsehood could
be traced to the Portuguese embassy in that capital. It was asserted
that England intending to retain her power in Portugal opposed the
return of the prince-regent; that the war itself being removed to
the frontier of France was become wholly a Spanish cause; that it was
not for Portugal to levy troops, and exhaust her resources to help a
nation whose aggressions she must be called upon sooner or later to
resist.
Mr. Stuart’s diplomatic intercourse with the government always
difficult was now a continual remonstrance and dispute; his
complaints were met with insolence or subterfuge, and illegal
violence against the persons and property of British subjects was
pushed so far, that Mr. Sloane, an English gentleman upon whom no
suspicion rested, was cast into prison for three months because he
had come to Lisbon without a passport. The rights of the English
factory were invaded, and the Oporto company which had been
established as its rival in violation of treaty was openly cherished.
Irresponsible and rapacious, this pernicious company robbed every
body, and the prince-regent promising either to reform or totally
abolish it ordered a preparatory investigation, but to use the words
of Mr. Stuart, the regency acted on the occasion no less unfairly by
their sovereign than unjustly by their ally.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account