History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 6
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Speaking of the “_Afrancesados_” or French party, more numerous than
was supposed and active to increase their numbers, he says, “The
thing which they most enforced and which made most progress was the
diminution of the English influence.” Amongst the serviles they
gained proselytes, by objecting the English religion and constitution
which restricted the power of the sovereign. With the liberals, they
said the same constitution gave the sovereign too much power; and the
Spanish constitution having brought the king’s authority under that
of the Cortez was an object of jealousy to the English cabinet and
aristocracy, who, fearing the example would encourage the reformers
of England, were resolved that the Spanish constitution should not
stand. To the Americans they observed that lord Wellington opposed
them, because he did not help them and permitted expeditions to
be sent from Spain; but to the Europeans who wished to retain the
colonies and exclude foreign trade, they represented the English as
fomenters and sustainers of the colonial rebellion, because they
did not join their forces with Spain to put it down. To the honest
patriots of all parties they said, that every concession to the
English general was an offence against the dignity and independence
of the nation. If he was active in the field, he was intent to
subjugate Spain rather than defeat the enemy; if he was careful in
preparation, his delay was to enable the French to conquer; if he
was vigorous in urging the government to useful measures, his design
was to impose his own laws; if he neglected the Spanish armies, he
desired they should be beaten; if he meddled with them usefully, it
was to gain the soldiers turn the army against the country and thus
render Spain dependent on England. And these perfidious insinuations
were effectual because they flattered the national pride, as proving
that the Spaniards could do every thing for themselves without the
aid of foreigners. Finally that nothing could stop the spread of such
dangerous doctrines but new victories, which would bring the simple
honesty and gratitude of the people at large into activity. Those
victories came and did indeed stifle the French party in Spain, but
many of their arguments were too well founded to be stifled with
their party.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account