History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Such was Cetshwayo’s frame of mind (even before he knew that
the decision was in his favour) at a time when he was popularly
represented as being in an aggressive, turbulent condition, preparing
to try his strength against us, and only waiting his opportunity to
let loose upon Natal the “war-cloud” which he was supposed to keep
“hovering on our borders.”
The boundary question resolved itself into this:
1. To whom did the land in dispute belong in the first instance?
2. Was it ever ceded or sold by the original possessors?
1. In answer to the first question, the Commissioners took the treaty
made in 1843, between the English and the Zulus, as a standpoint
fixing a period when the territory in dispute belonged entirely to
one or other. There was then no question but that the Zulu country
extended over the whole of it.
2. The Zulus deny ever having relinquished any part of their country
to the Boers, who on the other hand assert that formal cessions had
been made to them of considerable districts. With the latter rested
the obligation of proving their assertions, which were simply denied
by the Zulus, who accordingly, as they said themselves, “had no
witnesses to call,” having received no authority from the king to do
more than point out the boundary claimed[82] (2242, p. 80).
The Boer delegates brought various documents, from which they
professed to prove the truth of their assertions, but which were
decided by the Commissioners to be wholly worthless, from the glaring
discrepancies and palpable falsehoods which they contained. One of
these documents, dated March 16th, 1861, “purporting to give an
account of a meeting between Sir T. Shepstone, Panda, and Cetshwayo,”
they decided to be plainly a fabrication, as Sir T. Shepstone did
not arrive at Nodwengu,[83] from Natal, to meet Panda and Cetshwayo,
until May 9th, 1861.
Other records of cessions of land professed to be signed by the king,
but were witnessed by neither Boer nor Zulu, or else by Boers alone.
A definition of boundaries was in one case ratified by one Zulu only,
a man of no rank or importance; and in other documents alterations
were made, and dates inserted, clearly at another time.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account