History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
He sent a message to Cetshwayo on the subject, which in itself was
a temperate and very proper one for an English governor to send, in
the hope of checking such cruelty in future, and was not unnaturally
somewhat surprised at receiving an answer from the usually courteous
and respectful king, which showed plainly enough that he was highly
irritated and resented the interference with his management of
his people. Sir Henry had reminded him of what had passed at his
coronation, and Cetshwayo replies that if Somtseu (Sir T. Shepstone)
had told the white people that he (the king) had promised never to
kill, Somtseu had deceived them. “I have yet to kill,” he says. He
objects to being dictated to about his laws, and says that while
wishing to be friends with the English, he does not intend to govern
his people by laws sent to him by them. He remarks, in a somewhat
threatening way, that in future he shall act on his own account, and
that if the English interfere with him, he will go away and become a
wanderer, but not without first showing what he can do if he chooses.
Finally he points out that he and the Governor of Natal are in like
positions,[109] one being governor of Natal, the other of Zululand.
It is plain that this reply, as reported by the Government
messengers, produced a strong effect on Sir H. Bulwer’s mind, and
considerably affected his feeling towards the king, though, as
already stated, he never brought it, at the time or afterwards,
to the notice of Cetshwayo, and has since exchanged friendly
messages with him. And no doubt the reply was petulant and wanting
in due respect, though a dash of arrogance was added to it by the
interpreter’s use of the expression “we are equal,” instead of “we
are in like positions”—each towards our own people. But that the
formidable words “I have yet to kill,” “I shall now act on my own
account,” meant nothing more than the mere irritation of the moment
is plain from the fact that he never made the slightest attempt to
carry them out, though recent events have taught us what he might
have done had he chosen to “act on his own account.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account