History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Sir Henry Bulwer plainly took a very different view on this point
when he summed up the judgment of the Commissioners (2220, p. 388),
and added as follows: “I would venture to suggest that it is a fair
matter for consideration if those Transvaal subjects, who have been
induced ... under the sanction, expressed or tacit, of the Government
of the Republic, to settle and remain in that portion of the country,
have not a claim for compensation from their Government for the
individual losses they may sustain.”
Sir Bartle Frere, starting with phrases which might be supposed
to agree with the above, gradually and ingeniously shifts his
ground through propositions for compensation to be paid to farmers
“_required_ or _obliged_ to leave” (omitting the detail of _who is to
pay_), and then for compensation to be paid to farmers _wishing_ to
remove, until he finally arrives, by a process peculiarly his own,
at a measure intended to “secure private rights of property,” which
eventually blossomed out into a scheme for maintaining, in spite of
the award, the Boer farmers on the land claimed by them, which we
shall presently relate in full. Although nothing appeared in the
award itself on this point, the whole tone of it was calculated to
take the edge off the pleasure which the justice done them at last
would naturally give the Zulus, and it was promptly followed up by an
“ultimatum” from the High Commissioner calculated to absorb their
whole attention.
This “ultimatum” contained the following thirteen demands, and was
delivered on the same day with the award, an hour later:
1. Surrender of Sihayo’s three sons and brother to be tried by
the Natal courts.
2. Payment of a fine of five hundred head of cattle for the
outrages committed by the above, and for Ketshwayo’s delay in
complying with the request (N.B., not _demand_) of the Natal
Government for the surrender of the offenders.
3. Payment of a hundred head of cattle for the offence committed
against Messrs. Smith and Deighton (N.B., twenty days were
allowed for compliance with the above demands, _i.e._ until
December 31st, inclusive).
4. Surrender of the Swazi chief Umbilini, and others to be named
hereafter, to be tried by the Transvaal courts (N.B., no time was
fixed for compliance with this demand).
5. Observance of the coronation “promises.”
6. That the Zulu army be disbanded, and the men allowed to go
home.
7. That the Zulu military system be discontinued, and other
military regulations adopted, to be decided upon after
consultation with the Great Council and British Representatives.
8. That every man, when he comes to man’s estate, shall be free
to marry.
9. All missionaries and their converts, who until 1877 lived in
Zululand, shall be allowed to return and reoccupy their stations.
10. All such missionaries shall be allowed to teach, and
any Zulu, if he chooses, shall be free to listen to their
teaching.[111]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account