History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
difficulty in conveying his wounded (fortunately but few), and the
captured women and children. These captives were, on this account,
offered their freedom, but refused to accept it, which, perhaps, was
not unnatural, seeing that their homes and crops were destroyed, and
they had no longer any means of livelihood.
The force passed through the Intombi Valley, laying the country waste
for miles on either side of the road as it went, and met on its way
messengers from Colonel Wood, requesting the immediate presence of
the mounted corps. But upon the 23rd February, Colonel Rowlands
received a memorandum to the effect that the Lieut.-General, by
desire of the High Commissioner, wished him to proceed at once back
to Pretoria, to prepare some defence against the Boers, who had
assumed a threatening attitude. Upon the receipt of this order he
quitted the Luneburg district, and arrived on the 6th of March at
the capital of the Transvaal. Here there were but 200 infantry and
some few mounted volunteers; but by Colonel Rowlands’s exertions the
number was soon swelled to 600 or 700, by the addition of city corps
and other volunteers.
A considerable number of Boers who had never willingly accepted
the annexation of their country by the English, had taken the
opportunity, offered by the general confusion which reigned after
the disaster of the 22nd January, of endeavouring to regain the
independence of their state. Mass meetings were held to discuss the
subject, and finally a large body of armed men formed a camp at no
great distance from Pretoria. The situation appeared a very serious
one; and the High Commissioner himself travelled to Pretoria to
endeavour by his honeyed words to calm an agitation which might prove
so singularly inconvenient should the angry feelings of the indignant
Boers find vent in blows. On the 12th of April, just two years from
the day of the annexation, Sir B. Frere met a deputation of the
Transvaal farmers at Erasmus Spruit, about six miles from Pretoria,
and held a long discussion with them upon the subject of their
rights and wrongs. They repeatedly and plainly asserted that Sir
T. Shepstone had coerced the people into submission by threatening
them with the Zulus, and declared unanimously that nothing would
satisfy them but the recovery of their liberties. Sir Bartle Frere
gave them to understand in return that this was the only thing for
which they might not hope. He assured them that he looked upon the
_voortrekkers_ as an honour to their race, and that he felt proud to
belong to the same stock. The Queen, he told them, felt for them “as
for her own children;”[160] and he hoped to tell her that she had “no
better subjects in her empire,” than amongst them. The committee,
however, retired in complete dissatisfaction, and addressed a
petition to Her Majesty, in which they remark, “unwilling subjects
but faithful neighbours we will be;” and more than hint that they are
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account