History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
To secure the fulfilment of all these commands, Sir G. Wolseley told
the chiefs that he intended to leave an English officer as resident,
to be the eyes and ears of England, to watch over the people, and
to see the laws observed and that the chiefs ruled with justice and
equity. With what machinery the officer in question was to perform
so wide a task does not appear. Whether his position is to be a real
one, requiring several British regiments to support it, or whether it
is to be a mere farce, a fine-sounding pretence, remains yet to be
proved.
At the conclusion of the General’s discourse he produced a document,
the purport of which, he said, he had now told them, and which was to
be signed by all the chiefs whom he had chosen as rulers of the land,
to each of whom a duplicate copy would be given, while he retained a
similar one himself.
The first to sign his name was Mr. John Dunn, whose chieftainship
was by far the largest; and after him the Zulu chiefs touched the
pen while Mr. Shepstone made their crosses for them, in place of the
signature which they could not form.
For once in the history of Natal, all classes, from whatever widely
differing motives, were united in condemning the arrangement.
“The so-called settlement of Zululand,” says _The Cape Times_, on
September 16th, “is regarded with anything but satisfaction in Natal,
if we may accept the press of that colony as representative of public
opinion. Sir Garnet Wolseley was probably acting under instructions
in making peace on a barbarian basis; such a peace, however, has no
guarantee for continuance, but on the contrary an inherent weakness,
forbidding any hope of permanence. A savage nation is now divided
into a number of savage nations, each leaning to the other with all
the force of common blood and common traditions, while to check
the impulses of that force there is absolutely nothing beyond the
influence of two or three British residents, unsupported by any armed
retinue, and clothed with no more than a shadow of authority. And
as the embodiment of British civilisation, and as Her Majesty the
Queen’s own representative in Zululand, is placed Mr. John Dunn....
But whatever John Dunn’s merits may be, his appointment as Chief
Resident in Zululand is a shock to civilisation. His ways are Zulu
ways; his associations, Zulu associations; his very habits of thought
imbued with the Zulu character. A white man who for twenty years or
more has lived the Zulu life, wedded Zulu wives, and chosen their
society in preference to that of such women as a white man should
love and honour, is not the man to represent the Queen of England
in a nation of savages. The settlement of Zululand means simply
the appointment of a dozen Cetywayos, with a white man to look
after them, who is a Cetywayo in all but colour. And now Sir Garnet
Wolseley skips off in his light and airy fashion to the Transvaal,
flattering himself that he has made things pleasant in Zululand. It
is a miserable delusion....”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account