History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
[28] On June 24th, 1874, the Bishop presented this “Appeal on behalf
of Langalibalele” to His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor of Natal
and the executive committee of the Colony. The appeal was made in
the first instance to Sir B. C. C. Pine, who altogether refused to
listen to it. On this the Bishop forwarded a letter through the
Lieut.-Governor to the Earl of Carnarvon, enclosing a copy of his
correspondence with Sir B. C. C. Pine, and stating his reasons for
acting as he had done in the matter. This letter was dated August
6th, 1874, and on August 16th the Bishop left home _en route_ to
England.
[29] He was a bright intelligent lad, keenly anxious for
self-improvement, and with a great desire, unusual amongst his kind,
to go to England, and see a civilised country.
[30] The Zulus and Zulu-Kafirs bathe their persons frequently, but
they have not our ideas of cleanliness in respect to dress and
habitations, although they are very particular about their food,
utensils, and other matters.
[31] This was done at the expense of Government, which likewise
allowed certain supplies of meal, salt, and a little meat to the
captives.
[32] The boy was one of those who in the meanwhile had learnt at
Bishopstowe to read and write, and who therefore could be of some
use to his father as scribe, although his usefulness in that respect
is much curtailed by the exceeding caution of the Government, which
in its absurd and causeless fear of “treasonable correspondence,”
will not allow written words of any description to reach or leave
the poor old chief without official inspection. This precaution
goes so far that in one instance some mats made by the women for
Miss Colenso, and sent from Uitvlugt (the place of Langalibalele’s
confinement after he was removed from the island), never reached
their destination, owing to the paper attached, signifying for whom
they were intended, being removed, as coming under the head of
prohibited liberties. Another case is that of a lady who visited the
family in September, 1879, and asked them to tell her what trifles
they would like her to send them from Cape Town, but found that she
had no power to send some babies’ socks which the women had chosen,
and a comforter for the old man’s neck, except through an official
individual and by formal permission.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account