History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
The case, however, is very different when we turn to Mr. Shepstone’s
witnesses. Of these, nine in number (besides the four natives called
by both the Bishop and Mr. Shepstone), seven were natives; the other
two being the Secretary for Native Affairs and Mr. John Taylor—a
son of Mr. John Shepstone’s first wife by her former husband. Mr.
Taylor was a lad of nine at the time, but, having been present with
his mother and little sister on the occasion of the attack upon
Matshana, was summoned as a witness by Mr. Shepstone. His evidence
was chiefly important as helping to prove that Matshana’s party had
not the concealed weapons which Mr. Shepstone’s chief native witness
Nozitshina said were left by them in immense numbers upon the ground;
as he stated that he and his sister went over the ground, after the
affair was over, and picked up the assegais, “about eight or nine” in
number.
But it is important to remark that the very fact of the presence
at this meeting of Mrs. Shepstone with her two children, goes
far to disprove the account given by Mr. Shepstone in his second
“statement,” prepared by him on the occasion of this trial, but
which is greatly at variance on some vital points with the narrative
written by him on the day after the event, dated March 17th, 1858,
for the information of His Excellency the Lieut.-Governor. It
seems almost incredible that Mr. John. Shepstone should have, as
he says in his second statement, “made up his mind to face almost
certain” death, not only for himself and all his men, but for _his
wife and her two young children_, on the grounds that it was “too
late to withdraw at this stage” (same report), when at any time
since the “day or two previous” (_ibid._), when the information in
question[50] reached him; according to his account he might have
put off the meeting, or at all events have sent his wife and her
children to a place of safety. The Secretary for Native Affairs’
evidence could of course be of a merely official character, as he
was not present on the occasion. He stated that Mr. John Shepstone’s
letters of February 16th and 24th, 1858, asked for by the Bishop, on
the subject of the approaching interview with Matshana, could not be
found, although they “must have been recently mislaid,” as he himself
(the Secretary for Native Affairs) had quoted from one of them in his
minute for the Secretary of State in June, 1874. Of Mr. Shepstone’s
native witnesses it can only be said that, amongst the seven called
by him only, six contradicted themselves and each other to so great
an extent as to make their evidence of no value, while the evidence
of the seventh was unimportant, and the four witnesses called by both
Mr. Shepstone and the Bishop told the same story as did the witnesses
of the latter, most unexpectedly to him.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account