History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
The gist of Colonel Colley’s decision is altogether condemnatory of
Mr. J. Shepstone, some of whose statements, he says, “are entirely
without foundation,” and, by implication, also of his brother, the
Secretary for Native Affairs; yet virtually, and in the eyes of
the world, the decision was in their favour. To quote from _The
Natal Mercury_ of November 2nd, 1875: “It is still understood that
Mr. Shepstone, in the minds of impartial judges, stands more than
exonerated from the Bishop’s charges.” Mr. John Shepstone was
retained in his responsible position, and received further promotion;
and his brother was immediately appointed to the high office of
Administrator of Government, and sent out with power to annex the
Transvaal if he thought proper.
We have dwelt at some length upon the inquiry into the Matshana
case; for, since the annexation of the Transvaal was one of the
direct and immediate causes of the Zulu War, and since it seems
improbable that any other man than Sir Theophilus Shepstone could at
the moment have been found equally able to undertake the task, it
becomes a serious question to what extent an inquiry which had no
practical effect whatsoever upon the position of men whose conduct
had been stigmatised by the Secretary of State himself as “underhand
manœuvres, opposed to the morality of a civilised administration,”
may not be considered chargeable with the disastrous results. And,
further, we must protest against the spirit of the last sentence of
Lord Carnarvon’s despatch on the subject, in which he expresses his
“earnest hope that his (Colonel Colley’s) report will be received
by all parties to this controversy in the spirit which is to be
desired, and be accepted as a final settlement of a dispute which
cannot be prolonged without serious prejudice to public interests,
and without a renewal of those resentments which, for the good of the
community—English as well as native—had best be put to rest.”
A dislocated joint must be replaced, or the limb cannot otherwise be
pressed down into shape and “put to rest;” a thorn must be extracted,
not skinned over and left in the flesh; and as, with the dislocation
unreduced or the thorn unextracted, the human frame can never recover
its healthful condition, so it is with the state with an unrighted
wrong, an unexposed injustice.
The act of treason towards Matshana, hidden for many years, looked
upon by its perpetrators as a matter past and gone, has tainted all
our native policy since—unknown to most English people in Natal or
at home—and has finally borne bitter fruit in the present unhappy
condition of native affairs.
CHAPTER VIII.
THE ANNEXATION OF THE TRANSVAAL.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account