History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
“The following graphic description of this process (of Boer
encroachment) is extracted from a letter in the Transvaal _Advocate_
of a few weeks ago: ‘Frontiers are laid down, the claim to which
is very doubtful. These frontiers are not occupied, but farms are
inspected (“guessed at” would be nearer the mark), title-deeds for
the same are issued, and, when the unlucky purchaser wishes to take
possession, he finds his farm (if he can find it) occupied by tribes
of Kafirs, over whom the Government has never attempted to exercise
any jurisdiction.’ ‘Their Chief,’ it adds, ‘is rather bewildered
at first to find out that he has for years been a subject of the
Transvaal.’ ‘The Chief in question is one Lechune, living on the
north-west of the Republic. But the account is equally applicable
to the case of Sikukuni, or Umswazi, or half-a-dozen others, the
entire circuit of the Republic, from the Barolongs and Batlapins on
the west, to the Zulus on the east, being bordered by a _series of
encroachments disputed by the natives_.’”
A memorandum from Captain Clarke, R.A., Special Commissioner at
Lydenburg, dated April 23rd, 1879 (C. 2367, p. 152), also gives
an account of the way in which the Boers took possession of the
Transvaal itself, highly illustrative of their usual practice, and
of which the greater part may be quoted here, with a key to the real
meaning of phrases which require some study to interpret.
“On the entrance of the Fou Trekkers into the Transvaal, they
were compelled against their hereditary instincts to combine for
self-defence against a common foe.” (That is to say, that, having
forced themselves into a strange country, they necessarily combined
to oust those they found there.) “External pressure was removed by
success, and the diffusive instinct asserted itself”—which being
translated into ordinary English simply signifies that, having
conquered certain native tribes, they settled themselves upon their
lands, and returned to their natural disunited condition. “Isolated
families, whose ambition was to be out of sight of their neighbours’
smoke, pushed forward into Kafir-land” (as yet unconquered).
“Boundaries were laid down either arbitrarily or by unsatisfactorily
recorded treaty with savage neighbours. The natives, forced back,
acquired the powers of coalition lost by the Boers, and in their turn
brought pressure to bear on their invaders and whilom conquerors;
farm after farm had to be abandoned, and many of the Boers who
remained acknowledged by paying tribute that they retained their
lands by the permission of neighbouring chiefs. The full importance
of this retrograde movement was not at once felt, as a natural
safety-valve was found.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account