History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
From thence he, with another brother, and two indunas (captains)
were given up to Cetshwayo by the Boers, who required, in return for
their surrender, the cession of land _east_ of the Blood River, and
a pledge that the young princes should not be killed. Cetshwayo is
said by the Boers to have agreed to both conditions, and he certainly
acted up to the latter, three of the four being still alive, and the
fourth having died a natural death.[73] It is this alleged bargain
with Cetshwayo (in 1861) on which the Boers found their claim to the
main portion of the disputed territory—a “bargain in itself base and
immoral; the selling of the persons of men for a grant of land, and
which no Christian government, like that of England, could recognise
for a moment as valid and binding,” even if it were ever made. _But
it is persistently denied by the Zulus_ that such a bargain was ever
consented to by them or _by their prince_. On this point Cetshwayo
himself says: “I have never given or sold any land to the Boers of
the Transvaal. They wished me to do so when I was as yet an umtwana
(child, prince). They tried to get me to sign a paper, but I threw
the pen down, and never would do so, telling them that it was out of
my power to either grant or sell land, as it belonged to the king,
my father, and the nation. I know the Boers say I signed a paper,
and that my brothers Hamu and Ziwedu did also. I never did, and if
they say I held the pen or made a mark, giving or selling land, it is
a lie!” The Prince Dabulamanzi, and chiefs sitting round, bore out
the king in this statement. (From Report of Mr. Fynney on July 4th,
1877—P. p. 1961, p. 45.)
And so says Sir T. Shepstone (1961, p. 5): “Panda, who is still
living, repudiated the bargain, and Cetshwayo denied it. The
Emigrant Farmers, however, insisted on its validity, and proceeded
to occupy. The Zulus have never ceased to threaten and protest. And
the Government of Natal, to whom these protests and threats have been
continually made, has frequently, during a course of fifteen years,
found it very difficult to impress the Zulus with the hope and belief
that an amicable solution of the difficulty would some day be found,
provided that they refrained from reprisals or the use of force.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account