Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
People say a married woman can not have ulterior objects; that
her position is incompatible with a high intellectual culture;
that her thoughts and sympathies must be restricted to the four
walls of her dwelling. Why, if I were a woman (I speak only as a
man) and believed this popular doctrine, that she who is a wife
and a mother, being that, must be nothing more, but must cramp
her thoughts into the narrow circle of her own home, and indulge
no grander aspirations for universal interests--believing that, I
would forswear marriage. I would withdraw myself from human
society, and go out into the forest and the prairie to live out
my own true life in the communion and sympathy of my God. So far
as I was concerned, the race might become worthily extinct--it
should never be unworthily perpetuated. I could do no otherwise.
For we are not made merely to eat and drink, and give children to
the world. We are placed here upon the threshold of an immortal
life. We are but the chrysalis of the future. If immortality
means anything, it means unceasing progress for individuals and
for the race.
Mr. Blackwell complimented those women who were just inaugurating
a movement for a new costume, promising greater freedom and
health. He thought the sneers and ridicule so unsparingly
showered on the "Bloomers," might with more common sense be
turned on the "tight waists, paper shoes, and trailing skirts of
the fashionable classes."
The facts of history may as well be stated here in regard to the
"Bloomer" costume. Mrs. Bloomer was among the first to wear the dress,
and stoutly advocated its adoption in her paper, _The Lily_, published
at Seneca Falls, N. Y. But it was introduced by Elizabeth Smith
Miller, the daughter of the great philanthropist, Gerrit Smith, in
1850. She wore it for many years, even in the most fashionable circles
of Washington during her father's term in Congress. Lucy Stone, Miss
Anthony, and Mrs. Stanton, also wore it a few years. But it invoked so
much ridicule, that they feared the odium attached to the dress might
injure the suffrage movement, of which they were prominent
representatives. Hence a stronger love for woman's political freedom,
than for their own personal comfort, compelled them to lay it aside.
The experiment, however, was not without its good results. The dress
was adopted for skating and gymnastic exercises, in seminaries and
sanitariums. At Dr. James C. Jackson's, in Dansville, N. Y., it is
still worn. Many farmers' wives, too, are enjoying its freedom in
their rural homes.
Mrs. Bloomer, editor of _The Lily_, at Seneca Falls, New York, was
introduced at the close of Mr. Blackwell's remarks, and read a
well-prepared digest of the laws for married women.
Reporting one of the sessions, the _Plain Dealer_ said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account