Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
For my own part, I am not prepared to respect that philosophy. I
believe in sin, therefore in a sinner; in theft, therefore in a
thief; in slavery, therefore in a slaveholder; in wrong,
therefore in a wrong-doer; and unless the men of this nation are
made by woman to see that they have been guilty of usurpation,
and cruel usurpation, I believe very little progress will be
made. To say all this has been done without thinking, without
calculation, without design, by mere accident, by a want of
light; can anybody believe this who is familiar with all the
facts in the case? Certainly, for one, I hope ever to lean to the
charitable side, and will try to do so. I, too, believe things
are done through misconception and misapprehension, which are
injurious, yes, which are immoral and unchristian; but only to a
limited extent. There is such a thing as intelligent wickedness,
a design on the part of those who have the light to quench it,
and to do the wrong to gratify their own propensities, and to
further their own interests. So, then, I believe, that as man has
monopolized for generations all the rights which belong to woman,
it has not been accidental, not through ignorance on his part;
but I believe that man has done this through calculation,
actuated by a spirit of pride, a desire for domination which has
made him degrade woman in her own eyes, and thereby tend to make
her a mere vassal.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account