Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
That is my position. If you abandon the whole project I have no
objection. I am willing to rest the safety of the country where
it is and has been so far. I am open to conviction, open to
argument, open to reason even upon that subject; but I am willing
to leave this question of suffrage where our fathers left it,
where the world leaves it to-day, where all wise men leave it.
If, however, it is to be opened, if there is to be a new era, if
political power is to be distributed _per capita_ according to a
particular age, then I am for extending it to women as well as
men. Let me tell the honorable Senator I am not alone in this
opinion; the Senator from Ohio with me is not alone; one of the
first intellects of this age, perhaps the first man of the first
country of the earth, is of the same opinion. I allude to John
Stuart Mill, of Great Britain. He is now agitating for this very
thing in England. So that it need not seem surprising that I
should be in earnest in this; and I trust that after the
explanation I have made of my position and my doctrines. I shall
not be charged either with insincerity or with a desire to
ingratiate myself with the majority of this body, with the
majority of the people, or with any one, because, thank God, I am
free from all entanglements of that kind at this present
speaking, and if I retain my senses I think I shall keep free.
Mr. WADE: Mr. President, I did not intend to say a word upon this
subject, because on the first day of the last session of Congress
I introduced the original bill now before the Senate, to which
the Committee have proposed several amendments, and that action
on my part I supposed demonstrated sufficiently to all who might
read the bill what were my views and sentiments upon the question
of suffrage; and, sir, they are of no sudden growth. I have
always been of the opinion that in a republican government the
right of voting ought to be limited only by the years of
discretion. I have always believed that when a person arrived at
the age when by the laws of the country he was remitted to the
rights of citizens, when the laws fixed the age of majority when
the person was supposed to be competent to manage his own
affairs, then he ought to be suffered to participate in the
Government under which he lives. Nor do I believe that any such
rule is unsafe. I imagine that safety is entirely on the other
side, for just in proportion as you limit the franchise, you
create in the same degree an aristocracy, an irresponsible
Government; and gentlemen must be a little tinctured with a fear
of republican sentiment when they fear the extension of the right
of suffrage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account