Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
And now, when congress is asked to extend the same protection to
the women of the nation, we are told they have not the power, and
we are remanded to the States. They say the emancipation of the
slave was a war measure, a military necessity; that his
enfranchisement was a political necessity. We might with
propriety ask if the present condition of the nation, with its
political outlook, its election frauds daily reported, the
corrupt action of men in official position, governors, judges,
and boards of canvassers, has not brought us to a moral necessity
where some new element is needed in government. But, alas! when
women appeal to congress for the protection of their natural
rights of person and property, they send us for redress to the
courts, and the courts remand us to the States. You did not trust
the Southern freedman to the arbitrary will of courts and States!
Why send your mothers, wives and daughters to the unwashed,
unlettered, unthinking masses that carry popular elections?
We are told by one class of philosophers that the growing
tendency to increase national power and authority is leading to a
dangerous centralization; that the safety of the republic rests
in local self-government. Says the editor of the Boston _Index_:
What is local self-government? Briefly, that without any
interference from without, every citizen should manage his
own personal affairs in his own way, according to his own
pleasure; that every town should manage its own town affairs
in the same manner and under the same restriction; every
county its own county affairs, every State its own State
affairs. But the independent exercise of this autonomy, by
personal and corporate individuals, has one fundamental
condition, viz.: the maintenance of all these
individualities intact, each in its own sphere of action,
with its rights uninfringed and its freedom uncurtailed in
that sphere, yet each also preserving its just relation to
all the rest in an all comprehensive social organization.
Every citizen would thus stand, as it were, in the center of
several concentric and enlarging circles of relationship to
his kind; he would have duties and rights in each relation,
not only as an individual but also as a member of town,
county, State and national organization. His local
self-government will be at his highest possible point of
realization, when in each of these relations his individual
duties are discharged and his rights maintained.
On the other hand, what is centralization?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account