Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
That the constitution does not make such provision is not the
fault of the president; it must be attributed to the leading
Republicans who had it in their power once to change the
constitution so as to give the most ample powers to the general
government. When Attorney-General Devens was charged last May
with negligence in not prosecuting the parties accused of the
Mountain Meadow massacre, his defense was, that this horrible
crime was not against the United States, but against the
territory of Utah. Yet, it was a great company of industrious,
honest, unoffending United States citizens who were foully and
brutally murdered in cold blood. When Chief-Justice Waite gave
his charge to the jury in the Ellentown conspiracy cases, at
Charleston, S. C., June 1, 1877, he said:
That a number of citizens of the United States have been
killed, there can be no question; but that is not enough to
enable the government of the United States to interfere for
their protection. Under the constitution that duty belongs
to the State alone. But when an unlawful combination is made
to interfere with any of the rights of natural citizenship
secured to citizens of the United States by the national
constitution, then an offense is committed against the laws
of the United States, and it is not only the right but the
absolute duty of the national government to interfere and
afford the citizens that protection which every good
government is bound to give.
General Hawley, in an address before a college last spring, said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account