Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
The Rev. OLYMPIA BROWN, a delegate from Connecticut, addressed
the committee as follows: _Gentlemen of the Committee_--I would
not intrude upon your time and exhaust your patience by any
further hearing upon this subject if it were not that men are
continually saying to us that we do not want the ballot; that it
is only a handful of women that have ever asked for it; and I
think by our coming up from these different States, from
Delaware, from Oregon, from Missouri, from Connecticut, from New
Hampshire, and giving our testimony, we shall convince you that
it is not a few merely, but that it is a general demand from the
women in all the different States of the Union; and if we come
here with stammering tongues, causing you to laugh by the very
absurdity of the manner in which we advocate our opinions, it
will only convince you that it is not a few "gifted" women, but
the rank and file of the women of our country unaccustomed to
such proceedings as these, who come here to tell you that we all
desire the right of suffrage. Nor shall our mistakes and
inability to advocate our cause in an effective manner be an
argument against us, because it is not the province of voters to
conduct meetings in Washington. It is rather their province to
stay at home and quietly read the proceeding of members of
congress, and if they find these proceedings correct, to vote to
return them another year. So that our very mistakes shall argue
for us and not against us.
In the ages past the right of citizenship meant the right to
enjoy or possess or attain all those civil and political rights
that are enjoyed by any other citizen. But here we have a class
who can bear the burdens and punishments of citizens, but cannot
enjoy their privileges and rights. But even the meanest may
petition, and so we come with our thousands of petitions, asking
you to protect us against the unjust discriminations imposed by
State laws. Nor do we find that there is any conflict between the
duties of the national government and the functions of the State.
The United States government has to do with general interests,
but everything that is special, has to do with sectional
interests, belongs to the State. Said Charles Sumner:
The State exercises its proper functions when it makes local
laws, promotes local charities, and by its local knowledge
brings the guardianship of government to the homes of its
citizens; but the State transcends its proper functions when
in any manner it interferes with those equal rights recorded
in the Declaration of Independence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account