Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
DEAR MADAM--Hoping you will receive kindly what I am about to
write, I will proceed without apologies. I have confidence in
your nobleness of soul, and that you know enough of me to believe
in my devotion to the best interests of woman. I can scarcely
realize that you are giving your name and influence to a cause,
which, with some good but, as I think, misguided women, numbers
among its advocates others with loose morals. * * * We are, my
dear madam, as I suppose, related through our common ancester
Thomas Hooker. * * * Your husband, I believe, stands in the same
relation to that good and noble man. Perhaps he may think with
you on this woman suffrage question, but it does seem to me that
a wife honoring her husband would not wish to join in such a
crusade as is now going on to put woman on an equality with the
rabble at the "hustings." If we could with propriety petition the
Almighty to change the condition of the sexes and let men take a
turn in bearing children and in suffering the physical ailments
peculiar to women, which render them unfit for certain positions
and business, why, in this case, if we really wish to be men, and
thought God would change the established order, we might make our
petition; but why ask congress to make us men? Circumstances drew
me from the quiet of domestic life while I was yet young; but
success in labors which involved publicity, and which may have
been of advantage to society, was never considered as an
equivalent to my own heart for the loss of such retirement. In
the name of my sainted sister, Emma Willard, and of my friend
Lydia Sigourney, and I think I might say in the name of the women
of the past generation, who have been prominent as writers and
educators (the exception may be made of Mary Wollstonecraft,
Frances Wright, and a few licentious French writers) in our own
country and in Europe, let me urge the high-souled and honorable
of our sex to turn their energies into that channel which will
enable them to act for the true interests of their sex.
Yours respectfully,
ALMIRA LINCOLN PHELPS.
To which Mrs. Hooker, through _The Post_, replied:
WASHINGTON, January 15, 1878.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account