Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
Mary Clemmer, the gifted correspondent of the New York
_Independent_, learning that Senator Wadleigh was about to report
adversely upon the sixteenth amendment, wrote the following private
letter, which, as a record of her own sentiments on the question,
she gave to Miss Anthony for publication in this history:
Hon. BAINBRIDGE WADLEIGH--_Dear Sir_: The more I think of it the
more I regret that, as chairman of the Committee on Privileges
and Elections, you regard with less favor the enfranchisement of
women than did your distinguished predecessor, Senator Morton. At
this moment, when your committee is discussing that subject, I
sigh for the large outlook, the just mind, the unselfish decision
of that great legislator. You were his friend, you respected his
intellect, you believed in his integrity, you sit in his seat.
You are to prepare the report that he would prepare were he still
upon the earth. May I ask you to bring to that labor as fair a
spirit, as unprejudiced an outlook, as just a decision as he
would have done?
I ask this not as a partisan of woman's rights, but as a lover of
the human race. In this faint dawn of woman's day, I discern not
woman's development of freedom merely, but the promise of that
higher, finer, purer civilization which is to redeem the world,
the lack of which makes men tyrants and women slaves. You cannot
be unconscious of the fact that a new race of women is born into
the world, who, while they lack no womanly attribute, are the
peers of any man in intellect and aspiration. It will be
impossible long to deny to such women that equality before the
law granted to the lowest creature that crawls, if he happens to
be a man; denied to the highest creature that asks it, if she
happens to be a woman.
On what authority, save that of the gross regality of physical
strength, do you deny to a thoughtful, educated, tax-paying
person the common rights of citizenship because she is a woman? I
am a property-owner, the head of a household. By what right do
you assume to define and curtail for me my prerogatives as a
citizen, while as a tax-payer you make not the slightest
distinction between me and a man? Leave to my own perception what
is proper for me as a lady, to my own discretion what is wise for
me as a woman, to my own conscience what is my duty to my race
and to my God. Leave to unerring nature to protect the subtle
boundaries which define the distinctive life and action of the
sexes, while you as a legislator do everything in your power to
secure to every creature of God an equal chance to make the best
and most of himself.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account