Women -- Suffrage -- History; Women -- Suffrage -- United States -- History; Women's rights -- History; Women's rights -- United States -- History
The undersigned dissent from the report of the majority of the
committee. The demand for the extension of the right of suffrage
to women is not new. It has been supported by many persons in
this country, in England and on the continent, famous in public
life, in literature and in philosophy. But no single argument of
its advocates seems to us to carry so great a persuasive force as
the difficulty which its ablest opponents encounter in making a
plausible statement of their objections. We trust we do not fail
in deference to our esteemed associates on the committee when we
avow our opinion that their report is no exception to this rule.
The people of the United States and of the several States have
founded their political institutions upon the principle that all
men have an equal right to a share in the government. The
doctrine is expressed in various forms. The Declaration of
Independence asserts that "all men are created equal" and that
"governments derive their just powers from the consent of the
governed." The Virginia bill of rights, the work of Jefferson and
George Mason, affirms that "no man or set of men are entitled to
exclusive or separate emoluments or privileges from the rest of
the community but in consideration of public services." The
Massachusetts bill of rights, the work of John Adams, besides
reaffirming these axioms, declares that "all the inhabitants of
this commonwealth, having such qualifications as they shall
establish by their frame of government, have an equal right to
elect officers, and to be elected for public employment." These
principles, after full and profound discussion by a generation of
statesmen whose authority upon these subjects is greater than
that of any other that ever lived, have been accepted by
substantially the whole American people as the dictates alike of
practical wisdom and of natural justice. The experience of a
hundred years has strengthened their hold upon the popular
conviction. Our fathers failed in three particulars to carry
these principles to their logical result. They required a
property qualification for the right to vote and to hold office.
They kept the negro in slavery. They excluded women from a share
in the government. The first two of these inconsistencies have
been remedied. The property test no longer exists. The fifteenth
amendment provides that race, color, or previous servitude shall
no longer be a disqualification. There are certain qualifications
of age, of residence, and, in some instances of education,
demanded; but these are such as all sane men may easily attain.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account