History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 1 (of 2)Sokolow, Nahum
History
History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Sokolow, Nahum
Jews -- Restoration; Zionism -- History
¹ Wellington wrote in 1829 to the Earl of Aberdeen: (1784‒1860)
“... it cannot be doubted that the measures completed
by this Treaty of Peace must encourage other nations of
Christians to endeavour to attain the same advantages by
similar means. The other Powers of Europe and all parties
in Europe must view the Treaty of Peace in the same light
as we do ... they must all consider it in the same light
as the death-blow to the independence of the Ottoman Porte,
and the forerunner of the dissolution and extinction of
its power” (_The Eastern Question: Extracted from the
Correspondence of the late Duke of Wellington_, London,
1877, _p._ 40).
After the traitorous defection of the Turkish fleet to the side of
Mehemet Ali, five great Powers of Europe officially intimated to the
Porte that they had determined to discuss and settle together the
embarrassing Eastern question, and ultimately a Conference was called
together in London, at which the Ambassadors of these Powers were to
meet with full authority from their Governments to bring the matter to
a definite issue. It appeared throughout that France was favourable to
Mehemet Ali’s ambitious projects, whilst England had decided to compel
him to evacuate Syria forthwith and to restore the fleet before it
would entertain any proposition of his to be allowed to retain Egypt
in hereditary possession, or any part of Syria during his lifetime.
The negotiations in London dragged on slowly; month after month passed
by, and the high contracting parties came to no definite decision.
Everybody in England was anxious that Great Britain should play an
important rôle in the Eastern Question. The state of the East had
become utterly corrupt and hopeless. Great Britain considered that it
was in its interest to maintain the integrity of the Ottoman Empire.
What was meant by this principle? Great Britain as an Asiatic not
less than a European Power was interested to see that the Ottoman
Empire was made thoroughly independent and enabled to progress by
consolidating and developing its provinces. As to Syria, everybody in
England was aware that its possession was essential for the security
of the richest and most important provinces of Asiatic Turkey, to
which it was the military key. This was sufficiently demonstrated by
the events which actually took place.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account