History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 1 (of 2)Sokolow, Nahum
History
History of Zionism, 1600-1918, Vol. 1 (of 2)
Sokolow, Nahum
Jews -- Restoration; Zionism -- History
[The only sentence of this kind, against innumerable others
in the opposite sense.]
The law of Divine providence with regard to the nation of _Israel_ has
ever been that defection is eventually to be followed by dispersion
and reconciliation by restoration.
“Son of man, when the house of Israel dwelt in their own land
they defiled it....” (Ezekiel xxxvi. 17).
“... and I scattered them among the nations, and they were
dispersed through the countries;...” (_Ibid._ 19).
“... from all your uncleannesses, and from all your idols,
will I cleanse you” (_Ibid._ 25).
“And ye shall dwell in the land that I gave to your fathers;
and ye shall be My people, and I will be your God”
(_Ibid._ 28).
There is not one passage in which the promised restoration is
represented as anything other than a distinct proof of reconciliation
between God and his ancient People, or dispersion as anything other
than a punishment. The People and the Land of _Israel_ are so linked
with one another that whatever continuity is ascribed to the one must,
on all strict principles of interpretation, be also attributed to
the other. In the twenty-sixth chapter of _Leviticus_ we find _Moses_
giving the people, as warning and encouragement, a prophetic outline
of their future history, which forms the real basis, and, in fact,
makes up the substance of all that is found in the later prophets as
regards the people of _Israel_. It is true that both the judgments
there threatened and the mercies there promised are set forth
hypothetically, on the supposition of their wickedly departing from
the Lord and afterwards repenting――“_if ye walk contrary unto Me, and
will not hearken unto Me_,” on the one hand; “_if they shall confess
their iniquity_” on the other. But since the conditional statements
are changed――as they are in other places――into absolute announcements
of what is to take place, the hypothetical forms of expression must be
regarded as merely the appropriate mode of conveying warnings against
defection and an encouragement to repentance:――
“And they shall confess their iniquity, and the iniquity of
their fathers, ... and also that they have walked contrary
to Me” (Leviticus xxvi. 40).
“I also will walk contrary unto them, and bring them into
the land of their enemies; ... and they shall then be paid
the punishment of their iniquity” (_Ibid._ 41).
“then will I remember My covenant with Jacob, and also My
covenant with Isaac, and also My covenant with Abraham will
I remember; and I will remember the land” (_Ibid._ 42).
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account