Holmes' Own Story: In Which the Alleged Multi-murderer and Arch Conspirator Tells of the Twenty-two Tragic Deaths and Disappearances in Which He Is Said to Be Implicated, With Moyamensing Prison Diary AppendixMudgett, Herman W.
General
Holmes' Own Story: In Which the Alleged Multi-murderer and Arch Conspirator Tells of the Twenty-two Tragic Deaths and Disappearances in Which He Is Said to Be Implicated, With Moyamensing Prison Diary Appendix
Mudgett, Herman W.
Mudgett, Herman W., 1861-1896; Serial murderers -- Illinois -- Chicago -- Biography
people by a detective who, when near enough for them to hear, said,
“Mr. Holmes, these people are witnesses in the case for which you are
to be tried here, and I wish to see if they can identify you.”
MOTIVES.
Had my early life and associations been such as to predispose me
towards such criminal proceedings, still the want of motive remains.
I can show that no motive did exist. Those who knew me personally can
see that it could not have been avarice, for whenever I possessed even
a small surplus of ready money, those whom I was owing or friends in
need of same could always receive the most or all I possessed. Any
ungovernable temper is excluded, for I do not possess it. Appetence
cannot be ascribed as a motive, age and other circumstances to a great
extent excluding same. The principal motive thus far ascribed, namely,
that I had first involved my alleged victims in, or made them parties
to, dishonest transactions can be excluded, from the fact that all such
transactions are matters of recent date, and almost without exception
they are found to have done nothing criminal. Either one of the
foregoing I should prefer having my supposed shortcomings attributed
to than the only remaining motive I can think of, namely, insanity, to
which, either hereditary or acquired, I can plead not guilty, and be
substantiated in so doing by a sufficient number of medical experts,
whose testimony cannot be lightly overlooked.
Of the three more important cases, first that of the Williams sisters.
Nannie Williams was wholly without means. The following account will
show that had I given Hatch the $500 he wished to borrow of me in
Burlington, there would have been little due Nannie Williams; nothing
in fact, if I had included various small sums paid her from time to
time, of which no account was kept. It should also be borne in mind
that she still holds the title to the $10,000 Wilmette property, which,
on this account, is valueless to me.
RECEIVED OF M. R. WILLIAMS.
April, 1893, Cash, $2,500
April, 1893, Real Estate, 7,000
August, 1894, Cash, 600
————— $10,100
PAID M. R. WILLIAMS.
May, 1893, Cash, $2,500
July, 1893, Cash, 1,000
December, 1893, Cash, 750
January, 1894, Fort Worth
Incumbrance, 1,725
February, 1894, Cash, 1,750
October, 1894, Cash, 1,000
October, 1894, Cash, 412
————— $9,137
—————
$963
Shown by cashed drafts and checks endorsed by M. Williams, and other
forms of evidence.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account