Hooded Detective, Volume III No. 2, January, 1942Various
General
Hooded Detective, Volume III No. 2, January, 1942
Various
Detective and mystery stories -- Periodicals; Pulp literature
It would appear that persons of scientific attainment could be counted
upon not to attempt murder. This is not true. Education is not a
one-hundred percent deterrent to crime. Educated persons have only a
slightly less average as potential murderers than the illiterate. Not
even motives differ except in cases of murder for robbery. Considering
robbery as greed this difference is removed. Jealousy figures as a
motive in a large number of murders and among the educated murderers it
is paramount.
[Illustration]
Considering murder--for that matter all forms of crime--as an art it
would seem likely that the criminals of education or scientific
attainment would excel as master craftsmen. This isn't true either. Just
the opposite prevails. In practically all crimes attempted by scientists
they bungle their jobs completely. The record proves positively that as
criminals scientists are flunkies without a single recorded exception.
Where a murder is committed by a method that destroys its own evidence
or fails to leave what might be called a "trace" or clue detectives are
hampered but not necessarily baffled. In these cases, almost without
exception, it is circumstances that bring the criminal to punishment.
While a jury might refuse to convict on circumstantial evidence a
detective is not so deterred. The scientific detective turns science
against the scientific murderer. He batters the suspect with
circumstantial evidence until in nine out of ten cases the scientific
suspect weakens and acknowledges his crime. Circumstantial evidence
backed by a confession that checks on all angles is about all any jury
needs to be convinced of guilt.
When your correspondent began to dig into this subject of artistic or
scientific murder Government detectives--themselves master
scientists--made a request. They asked that we be "a little vague" in
the use of proper names and in description of the eighteen murder
methods most difficult of detection. So, we will name no chemicals or
poisons but confine ourselves to effects and processes.
The commonest method is the complete destruction of the corpse--the
corpus delicti. Cremation is the usual means resorted to. The body is
burned in a furnace or on a pyre. Effort is sometimes made to make
identification impossible by burning the body or parts of it in gasoline
flames. The scientist has no edge on his uneducated fellow in this type
of murder case. He practically never is able to remain with the burning
corpse long enough to do a perfect job.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account