Horace Walpole and His World: Select Passages from His LettersWalpole, Horace
General
Horace Walpole and His World: Select Passages from His Letters
Walpole, Horace
Walpole, Horace, 1717-1797 -- Correspondence
“I went yesterday to see the Duke of Queensberry’s palace at
Richmond, under the conduct of George Selwyn, the _concierge_.
You cannot imagine how noble it looks now all the Cornbury
pictures from Amesbury are hung up there. The great hall, the
great gallery, the eating-room, and the corridor, are covered
with whole and half-lengths of royal family, favourites,
ministers, peers, and judges, of the reign of Charles I.--not
one an original, I think, at least not one fine, yet altogether
they look very respectable; and the house is so handsome, and
the views so rich, and the day was so fine, that I could only
have been more pleased if (for half an hour) I could have seen
the real palace that once stood on that spot, and the persons
represented walking about!--A visionary holiday in old age,
though it has not the rapture of youth, is a sedate enjoyment
that is more sensible because one attends to it and reflects
upon it at the time; and as new tumults do not succeed, the
taste remains long in one’s memory’s mouth.”
Walpole was late this year in removing to Berkeley Square. The
political topic of the London season was the debates in the House of
Commons on the charges against Warren Hastings; the social topic, in
our author’s circle at any rate, appears to have been some theatrical
performances at the Duke of Richmond’s house in Whitehall. Horace seems
to have interested himself a good deal more in the latter subject than
the former. Lady Ossory having urged him to read a pamphlet in favour
of Mr. Hastings, he replies:
“The pamphlet I have read, Madam; but cannot tell you what
would have been my opinion of it, because my opinion was
influenced before I saw it. A lady-politician ordered me to
read it, and to admire it, as the _chef-d’œuvre_ of truth,
eloquence, wit, argument, and impartiality; and she assured
me that the _reasonings_ in it were unanswerable. I believe
she meant the _assertions_, for I know she uses those words as
synonymous. I promised to obey her, as I am sure that ladies
understand politics better than I do, and I hold it as a rule
of faith--
“That all that they admire is sweet,
And all is sense that they repeat.
“How much ready wit they have! I can give you an instance,
Madam, that I heard last night. After the late execution of
the _eighteen_ malefactors, a female was hawking an account of
them, but called them _nineteen_. A gentleman said to her, ‘Why
do you say _nineteen_? there were but _eighteen_ hanged.’ She
replied, ‘Sir, I did not know _you_ had been reprieved.’”
A week later, he writes again:
“Berkeley Square, Feb. 9, 1787.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account