Horrors and Atrocities of the Great War: Including the Tragic Destruction of the LusitaniaMarshall, Logan
History
Horrors and Atrocities of the Great War: Including the Tragic Destruction of the Lusitania
Marshall, Logan
World War, 1914-1918 -- Atrocities
In many campaigns of the past, disease has slain its thousands where
bullets and shells have killed hundreds, and even the twentieth century
with its marvelous science of sanitation has not defeated the direful
common enemies of allies and foes. Why disease should attack masses of
men in the prime of life, living in the open air, and on the whole well
fed and clothed, at first sight seems strange, but when we remember that
modern fighting begets an intolerable thirst, which the soldier is
naturally tempted to slake as best he can and when he can, at least one
reason is not hard to find.
All modern armies, since the striking experience of Japan in the
Manchurian campaign, pay special attention to the drinking water, and
with good results. But an irremovable source of disease remains in the
typhus-carrying vermin, in the myriads of flies bred in the rotting
carcases of men and horses and in the filth that inevitably collects
around perpetually shifting camps and bivouacs. As everyone now knows,
these insects are ceaseless and tireless carriers of infection, and it
is difficult to see how, under conditions of war, the plague of them can
be utterly wiped out.
SCOURGES OF MODERN WARFARE
Of the diseases which assail an army in the field, a few stand out so
prominently that all others may practically be neglected. These are
cholera, typhus, typhoid fever, dysentery, and pneumonia; and they have
this in common, that they are all caused by specific bacilli. Thus
cholera is the child, so to speak, of the dreaded vibrio, and pneumonia
that of the pneumococcus; while typhus, typhoid and dysentery have each
their own special microbe. The modes of attack are, however, different,
for the pneumococcus can enter the organism by the nose and mouth only;
typhoid and dysentery through the alimentary canal; while the way in
which cholera is propagated is at present unknown. All have this in
common, that while the microbes causing them are probably always
present--that of cholera being a doubtful exception--they seem only to
assault a subject previously weakened by exposure, bad food, or
intemperance.
RAVAGES OF TYPHUS IN SERVIA
The dread aftermaths of war made their first visitations upon the
Servian nation. One read with dismay that Belgium was later outdone by
Poland, and Poland seemed almost fortunate beside Servia. The account
sent by Captain E. N. Bennett, Commissioner in Servia for the British
Red Cross Society, of the conditions prevailing in Servian hospitals and
prisoners’ camps filled the whole world with dread. “Fires are needed
to clear Servia of typhus, just as fires were needed to stop the great
plague in London,” reported Sir Thomas Lipton, who spent considerable
time in that country. He said:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account