[Sidenote: Horsemanship for war]
"The rough-riders from the Royal Artillery Riding Establishment,
using the hunting seat, sat perfectly without either reins or
stirrups over a five-foot six-inch rail--one horse jumping six
feet--besides other formidable obstacles, which proves that no better
seat could be wanted for practical work."
The practical work, one notes, for a civilized Army, is jumping!
What is the horse to be used for? Pleasure?
By all means let the high-strung, highly-fed, massaged,
hospital-bred, courageous, and powerful but exceedingly delicate
blooded horse be used for pleasure, and for pleasure only. One does
not use a racing yacht for cruising, because she is too fragile, or
for cargo because {227} she has no stowage. Use the blooded horse
for running and jumping, with a day's rest following each day's
sport. It does not matter if the rider's weight is concentrated on
the space of a postage stamp. It only matters that the equipment be
light for high speed, and slippery to throw the rider in case he is
not wanted on the saddle.
[Sidenote: Mobility]
What is the horse to be used for? War? Then if we love our country
let us forget tradition, take a rest from filling up returns, and set
ourselves to the exercise of human reason until we find out what we
really want. Why do we use the horse in war? To carry men, to haul
guns, and draw supplies. Why do we use the horse for transport? To
quicken the pace, and ease the labour of men. Why do we need this
mobility? In order to concentrate troops at distant points where
they were not expected. Mobility is not jumping on Germans, but the
long, swift march that covers and supplies the advance or the retreat
which shall decide the issue. Mobility may include the getting and
rendering of vital news, the sudden seizure of a strong position, or
even the special privilege and glory of shock action.
Those of us who indulged ourselves in the {228} habit of thinking,
knew many years ago that mechanical transport would carry and haul
men and supplies much quicker than horses could upon a highway. But
we also observed that war destroys the road, and that campaigning is
a cross-country exercise wherein the horse can hold his own against
the car.
In the same way we knew as far back as 1896 that aerial warfare would
evolve in three phases: reconnaissance, fleet engagements, and
occupations in force with aerial transport.
Yet, while the car and the aircraft have been foreseen by everybody
who took the trouble to think, we have to deal in fact with present
needs for troops transported by horses, for whom the word mobility
means rapid and sustained haulage and carriage of weight. It is not
the art of jumping hedges, because they do not exist in any probable
terrain of war.
What then, are the factors for mobility?
[Sidenote: The pleasure horse]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account