Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
ATHERTON. Could we have seen him at home at Clairvaux, after one of
those famous Italian journeys, no look or word would have betrayed a
taint of spiritual pride, though every rank in church and state united
to do him honour—though great cities would have made him almost by force
their spiritual king—though the blessings of the people and the plaudits
of the council followed the steps of the peacemaker—and though, in the
belief of all, a dazzling chain of miracles had made his pathway
glorious. We should have found him in the kitchen, rebuking by his
example some monk who grumbled at having to wash the pots and pans; on
the hill-side, cutting his tale and bearing his burthen with the meanest
novice; or seen him oiling his own boots, as they say the arch-tempter
did one day; we should have interrupted him in the midst of his tender
counsel to some distressed soul of his cloistered flock, or just as he
had sat down to write a sermon on a passage in Canticles against the
next church-festival.[42] But now to my notes. (_Atherton reads._)
In considering the religious position of Bernard, I find it not at
all remarkable that he should have been a mystic,—very remarkable
that he should not have been much more the mystic than he was. This
moderation may be attributed partly to his constant habit of
searching the Scriptures—studying them devotionally for himself,
unencumbered with the commentaries reverenced by tradition.[43]
Rigid exemplar and zealous propagator of monasticism as he was,
these hours with the Bible proved a corrective not unblessed, and
imparted even to the devotion of the cloister a healthier tone. Add
to this his excellent natural judgment, and the combination, in his
case, of the active with the contemplative life. He knew the world
and men; he stood with his fellows in the breach, and the shock of
conflict spoiled him for a dreamer. The distractions over which he
expended so much complaint were his best friends. They were a
hindrance in the way to the monastic ideal of virtue—a help toward
the Christian. They prevented his attaining that pitch of
uselessness to which the conventual life aspires, and brought him
down a little nearer to the meaner level of apostolic labour. They
made him the worse monk, and by so much the better man.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account