Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
ATHERTON. A grand aim, if so: but to reach it he unfortunately absorbs
the objective in the subjective element of religion—rebounds from
servility to arrogance, and makes humanity a manifestation of the Divine
Essence.
GOWER. In order to understand his position, the question to be first
asked appears to me to be this. If Eckart goes to the Church, and says,
‘How can I be assured that I am in a state of salvation?’ what answer
will the Holy Mother give him? Can you tell me, Atherton?
ATHERTON. She confounds justification and sanctification together, you
will remember. So she will answer, ‘My son, as a Christian of the
ordinary sort, you cannot have any such certainty—indeed, you are much
better without it. You may conjecture that you are reconciled to God by
looking inward on your feelings, by assuring yourself that at least you
are not living in any mortal sin. If, indeed, you were appointed to do
some great things for my glory, you might find yourself among the happy
few who are made certain of their state of grace by a special and
_extra_ revelation, to hearten them for their achievements.’
GOWER. Shameful! The Church then admits the high, invigorating influence
of such certainty, but denies it to those who, amid secular care and
toil, require it most.
WILLOUGHBY. While discussing Eckart, we have lighted on a doctrine which
must have produced more mysticism than almost any other you can name. On
receiving such reply, how many ardent natures will strain after visions
and miraculous manifestations, wrestling for some token of their safety!
GOWER. And how many will be the prey of morbid introspections, now
catching the exultant thrill of confidence, and presently thrown
headlong into some despairing abyss.
ATHERTON. As for the mass of the people, they will be enslaved for ever
by such teaching, trying to assure themselves by plenty of sacraments,
believing these the causes of grace, and hanging for their spiritual all
on the dispensers thereof.
WILLOUGHBY. Then, to apply the result of your question, Gower, to
Eckart,—as he has in him nothing servile, and nothing visionary, he
resolves to grasp certainty with his own hand—wraps about him relics of
the old Greek pallium, and retires to his extreme of majestic isolation.
GOWER. Pity that he could not find the scriptural _Via Media_—that
common truth which, while it meets the deepest wants of the individual,
yet links him in wholesome fellowship with others—that pure outer light
which nurtures and directs the inner.
WILLOUGHBY. No easy way to find in days when Plato was installed high
priest, and the whole biblical region a jungle of luxuriant allegoric
conceits or thorny scholastic formulas.
GOWER. This daring Eckart reminds me of that heroic leader in Beaumont
and Fletcher’s _Bonduca_. I think I hear him cry with Caratach,
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account