Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious OpinionVaughan, Robert Alfred
Religion
Hours with the Mystics: A Contribution to the History of Religious Opinion
Vaughan, Robert Alfred
Mysticism -- History
‘Yet some will ask what remains after a man hath thus lost himself
in God? I answer, nothing but a fathomless annihilation of himself,
an absolute ignoring of all reference to himself personally, of all
aims of his own in will and heart, in way, in purpose, or in use.
For in this self-loss man sinks so deep into the ground that if he
could, out of pure love and lowliness, sink himself deeper yet, and
become absolutely nothing, he would do so right gladly. For such a
self-annihilation hath been brought to pass within him that he
thinketh himself unworthy to be a man, unfit to enter God’s house
and temple, and to look upon a crucifix painted on the wall; yea,
such a man deemeth himself not so good by far as the very worst.
Nevertheless, as far as regards the sufferings and death of the
Lord—the birth and incarnation of the Son of God—His holy and
perfect life that He lived on earth among sinful men, all this such
a man did never before so heartily and strongly love as now he doth;
yea, now his care is how he may order his life right Christianly,
and fashion it anew, and out of fervent love toward his Lord and
Saviour, exercise himself without ceasing in all good work and
virtue.’[124]
‘There are those who thoughtlessly maim and torture their miserable
flesh, and yet leave untouched the inclinations which are the root
of evil in their hearts. Ah, my friend, what hath thy poor body done
to thee, that thou shouldst so torment it? Oh folly! mortify and
slay thy sins, not thine own flesh and blood.’[125]
WILLOUGHBY. My dear Atherton, this is grand doctrine. May I never be
farther from the kingdom of heaven than such a mystic. Surely Luther’s
praise is just. Compare such theology as this with the common creed and
practice of that day. The faults are nearly all those of the time—the
excellence his own.
ATHERTON. It is wonderful to see how little harm his Platonism can do to
a man so profoundly reverent, so fervent in his love to Christ. How
often he seems to tread the verge of Eckart’s pantheistic abyss, but
never falls into it! His heart is true; he walks uprightly, and so,
surely. That conception of sin as selfishness—that doctrine of
self-abandonment, death in ourselves and life in God—these are
convictions with him so deep and blessed—so far beyond all Greek
philosophy—so fatal to the intellectual arrogance of pantheism, that
they bear him safe through every peril.
GOWER. His sermons cannot fail to do one good—read with the heart and
imagination. But if you coldly criticise, and can make no allowance for
the allegories and metaphors and vehement language of the mystic, you
may shut the book at once.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account