Practically there is a divergence when their clothing begins to differ,
but this is merely artificial. The girl is made to wear finer and more
delicate clothing than the boy; its texture and form impede her
movements, and it is more easily injured by the weather. But where a
girl is sensibly dressed, so that her clothes will not spoil with the
rain, nor prevent her moving her limbs freely, this diversity between
the two disappears.
But although it will not harm a girl to share her brother's pursuits
till the age of fourteen, the conditions of her so doing will depend
upon circumstances. Except in the case of twins, the boy will be rather
older or younger than the girl, if even she have brothers about her own
age at all, and many accidents will be found to control her education.
Besides these, nature works gradually, and there are seldom abrupt
transitions in her processes. The girl's future skill of hand and the
boy's strength of arm will be prepared for, and seen, in their
differences of taste and choice of pursuits and games; the girl will
prefer working for her doll and protecting it from the boy's rough
handling, and the boy will love his bat and knife. He will show his
instinct for construction, and she hers for preservation, after the
first early stage when both alike delight in destruction. Here
education comes into use, leading each child to exercise the good
instinct instead of its converse.
When the conventional proprieties are not allowed to warp the natural
taste, a girl loves running and climbing as well as the boy does: she
likes to collect stamps, minerals, fossils, birds' eggs, insects, etc.,
fully as much as he does. Their favourite books are identical, their
scrap-books equally enjoyed, the theatre and theatricals at home
delighted in by both, and their pets are much beloved. Why, then,
should we make so much difference between them where Nature has created
none?
Girls of the upper classes are always at lessons of some kind from six
years old to eighteen; thus they have twelve years of instruction, and
we know that of old a seven year's apprenticeship was held sufficient
to make a master in some craft. What do the twelve years do for our
girls? Does their training enable them to maintain them decently in any
one line? What have they learnt, and what can they do?
They have learnt music enough to play a _morceau de salon_ showily, and
the allegretto movement of a sonata stumblingly, and the latter only
because it was thought 'proper' that they should learn 'classical
music.' But they do not know enough even to learn another _morceau de
salon_ without the help of a master, so of course music cannot be
reckoned upon as doing much for them.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account