Household Words, No. 14, June 29, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household Words, No. 14, June 29, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
From what may be called one river side extremity of South London, we
skip over the central water-side parishes, and go to the opposite
extremity of the metropolis to find at Greenwich our next healthiest
district. Like Lambeth, this place lies low, is badly drained, and has a
poor class of houses, and consequently of people. The secret of its
position on the scale of health is to be found in the fact that the
population is not dense, being only twenty-one to an acre; that it has a
fine park for a playground, and is in near neighbourhood to Blackheath,
and thence to the open and healthy hills and fields of Kent.
Now we must return again to the centre of London for its next most
healthy parish. It is St. Martin’s-in-the-Fields; but having, it is
almost needless to say, no rural character, except by name. Trafalgar
Square, with its fountains, is almost its only enjoyable open space. The
density of population is not over great for such a position; the rental
high; the deaths two hundred and forty to ten thousand living each year.
Away east again for our next and last parish that stands above the
general average of London. Stepney is the place, with its multitude of
small houses at low rentals. It has its water from the river Lea, and
its inhabitants have not very far to go when they wish for a ramble in
the fields. Its yearly contribution to our total mortality is two
hundred and forty-two out of ten thousand souls.
And here a dark line has to be drawn; for Stepney is close down upon the
average mortality of all London. Each parish already named pays less
than the average tribute to death—those presently to be enumerated pay
more. The contributions vary from Clerkenwell, which is the least
unhealthy on the black list to Whitechapel, which is the most unhealthy.
This last parish indeed is the worst in all the metropolis. Between the
two extremes of insalubrity, the districts range in the following order:
Clerkenwell, brought down in the scale by its nests of poverty, and
doubtless, by its huge over-gorged grave-yard. Bethnal Green, with its
host of small houses, and average rental of only 9_l._ The Strand—the
great thoroughfare of fine shops—with a back neighbourhood of filthy
alleys and riverside abominations. Shoreditch, with its stock of poor
people and old clothes. Westminster—regal, historical Westminster—raised
but two feet above the water level, and famous alike for its abbey, its
palace, and its rookeries. Bermondsey, just level with the water line,
and poisoned by open drains and unsavoury factories. Rotherhithe, damp
and foggy. St. Giles’s, another spot renowned for vice, poverty, and
dirt. St. George’s, Southwark, low, poor, and densely crowded. Next come
the two portions of the City of London, technically described as East
London and West London, being in fact those parts beyond the centre
surrounding the Mansion House—the portions indeed especially indulged
with the frowsiness of Cripplegate and the choked-up smells of
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account