Household words, No. 2, April 6, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 2, April 6, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
The unwholesome practice of intra-ecclesiastical interment became
general after the 10th century, when the clergy succumbed to the power
of money, and the sale of the indulgence proved too profitable to be
abandoned. To show by what frauds the unhealthy custom was kept up, we
may cite a legend relating to St. Dunstan. An unbaptised son of Earl
Harold having been deposited within the church where the deceased saint
rested, St. Dunstan—so the fable runs—appeared twice to the chaplain
to complain that he could not rest in his grave for the stench of the
young Pagan. Other underground saints were, however, consulted on the
matter, and they silenced St. Dunstan by acquiescing in the abuse.
It therefore not only continued but gave rise to another evil. Tombs
came to be erected, and these became convenient as lurking-places and
rendezvous for various immoral and improper purposes. The Council of
Winchester, in 1240, forbade the holding of markets, gaming and other
iniquities performed among the tombs in churches and cemeteries. But
this injunction was of little avail, as we learn from the History of
St. Paul’s. Duke Humphrey’s Tomb in ‘Paul’s walk’ (the middle aisle of
the Cathedral), was the occasional resort for ages of the idleness and
infamy of London. It was a regular mart and meeting place for huxters,
gossips, gamblers, and thieves. In 1554 the Lord Mayor prohibited the
church to be used for such ‘irreverent’ purposes, under pain of fine.
Still it was not till the great fire that Duke Humphrey’s tomb was
utterly deserted.
Meanwhile in every part of the country, families who could afford the
expense, were buried inside in preference to outside the various places
of worship, and, until the present year, no effective stop has been
put to the evil. Our French neighbours were before us in this respect.
Inhumation inside churches was forbidden except in rare cases, by a
royal ordinance dated Versailles, 10th March, 1777. We perceive by
the excellent report of Dr. Sutherland to the Board of Health on the
practice of interments in Germany and France, that cemeteries have been
since substituted by law in almost every considerable town in those
countries. It has therefore been continued, almost exclusively in this
empire.
At last, however, we have good reason to hope that intramural burials,
with all their attendant evils, will speedily be themselves buried with
the barbarous relics of the past. The comprehensive suggestions of the
Board of Health appear to meet every difficulty, and as a strong stream
of common sense has, we hope and believe, set in in favour of funereal
reform, we trust they will pass into the statute book without much
opposition; some they will inevitably encounter, in compliance with the
fixed law of English obstinacy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account