Secondly, there is a greater likelihood of some person being present
who is naturally endowed with mediumistic powers, in which case it
becomes easier for a spirit to enter into communication with the
sitters.
Thirdly, whatever may be the true explanation of the manner in which
manifestations are brought about, it is well known that the more
numerous the sitters the more full and complete are the phenomena.
The theory of the sitters contributing “electricity” and “personal
magnetism” may be very safely rejected as nonsensical; for the very
words employed are not used in their ordinary scientific meaning and no
other signification has ever been propounded. But each person present
does undoubtedly make some contribution to what may be called the
common stock of psychical influence available in the room where the
sitting takes place.
It should be a matter of common understanding and agreement that
the sitters in an Expectancy Circle are all animated by a serious
purpose and have not come together for mere amusement or for the
“fun” of tricking each other. There is no objection to their being
as “sceptical” as they please. A sitter may be of opinion that all
occultism is “tomfoolery” and “piffle.” Opinions do not alter facts.
If psychical phenomena do really occur all the scepticism in the world
is of no moment; and no good evidence has ever been brought forward
to show that spirits are in any way embarrassed by the presence of
doubters and resisters; though it is true enough that passivity on the
part of the sitters favours communication. A sceptic may happen to be
a good medium without being aware of the fact; in which case his or
her mental prejudice will not hinder a spirit from making use of the
psychic power thus brought into the Circle. At the same time practical
joking and the surreptitious imitation of phenomena are quite out of
place. They cannot do any good: they are productive of confusion; and,
seeing that discarnate spirits have not changed their minds at death,
there does not exist any reason for supposing such beings to have
become incapable of taking offence and going away in high dudgeon when
sitters attempt to make fools of them--in which case, of course, the
sitting is a failure.
With regard to the arrangement of the sitters, this is entirely a
matter of convenience. Seats may be provided round a table or scattered
about a room. And not the least attention need be paid to the sitters
joining hands or being otherwise in contact with each other: the
supposed necessity of this being a popular delusion based upon some
vague and erroneous notion of “electricity.”
The use of a table is, however, to be recommended. It is desirable for
each sitter to have a pencil and paper in readiness; for it cannot be
known in advance which particular individuals are capable of automatic
writing; and a table facilitates the manifestation as well as providing
a convenient standing-place for signalling apparatus, etc.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account