How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
=Temple Plans.=--The plan of the Roman temple was circular, polygonal, or
rectangular; the last being the most usual type. The best preserved
example is the so-called “=Maison Carrée=” at =Nîmes= in Provence, which was
erected during the reign of Hadrian (<small>A.D.</small> 117-138). Its form is of the
favourite kind: pseudo-peripteral, that is to say, the columns which
surround the sides and end are not detached from but built into the
walls of the cella. The portico has a deep projection, supported by ten
detached columns. As usual in a Roman temple the stylobate is replaced
by a podium, in this case about twelve feet high, which projects in
front, enclosing the entrance steps. The columns are of the Corinthian
order, 32 feet in height, supporting an entablature which measures 8
feet to the lower angles of the pediment. The frieze is bored with
holes, in which it is supposed the letters of an inscription were fixed,
and the cornice is richly decorated.
Another very interesting example at =Nîmes= is the so-called =Temple of
Diana=, which probably was a _nymphæum_, or structure for flowers,
statuary, and fountains, attached to some _thermæ_. The plan shows a
central chamber, flanked by two passages; the exterior walls being
devoid of columns. Meanwhile, the interior walls of the central chamber
have a series of detached columns, supporting an entablature from which
spring the curves of the barrel-vaulted ceiling. The outward thrust of
the latter is offset by the continuous vaulting of the side-passages. It
is probable, as we shall see, that this arrangement furnished a type for
many of the Romanesque churches of Southern France.
Of the circular temples the best known examples are the =Temple of Mater
Matuta= in =Rome=, the =Temple of Vesta= at =Tivoli=, and the =Pantheon=. Nothing
but a few fragments remain of the =Temple of Vesta= in the =Forum Romanum=.
The first named, situated in the =Forum Boarium=, is peripteral,
consisting of a cylindrical cella, 28 feet in diameter surrounded by a
circular colonnade of 20 Corinthian columns, 34 feet 7 inches high; the
whole standing on a podium raised 6 feet from the ground. In the case of
the Temple of Vesta at Tivoli the Corinthian columns, 18 in number, are
11 feet lower. “The reason for this difference,” writes Professor
Banister-Fletcher, “is instructive. The Temple of Mater Matuta, placed
in a low, flat situation, has columns of slender proportion in order to
give it the required height; whereas the Tivoli example, placed on the
edge of a rocky prominence and thus provided with a lofty basement, has
columns of sturdier proportions.” A further difference is found in the
foliage decoration of the capitals of the two temples; those of the
=Temple of Mater Matuta= having pointed leaves of the Hellenic type of
acanthus, while in the Temple of Tivoli the Roman type is adhered to.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account