How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
The floors were paved with richly coloured marbles, in _opus sectile_ or
_opus Alexandrinum_. Marble, also, cut in thin veneers and arranged so
that their veining produced symmetrical designs, was applied to the
walls. Marble, again, but incised with carved ornament, covered the
soffits of the arches, the archivolts, and spandrels, while the vaulting
was resplendent with mosaics, composed of figures and ornaments,
executed in enamelled glass upon a background of gold or blue or, more
rarely, pale green.
Colour was pre-eminently the motive of the interior decoration and to
this end carved work was subordinated. The ornament was in very low
relief, spreading over the surface in intricate patterns, that suggest
the delicate enrichment of lace. Mouldings were replaced by bands of
mosaic or marble, carved or smooth. The chief motive of the carved
ornamentation was the mingling of the acanthus and anthemion. The
treatment of both was rather Hellenic than Roman; the foliage having
pointed ends; but it was deeply channelled and drilled with deep holes
at the springing of the leaves. In fact, the use of the drill as well as
the chisel was characteristic of Byzantine carving and emphasises the
suggestion of the ornament being raised rather than, as in Roman
decoration, applied. Corresponding to the general flatness of the
ornament is the constraint of the contours of the mouldings, suggestive
of Asiatic languor and in marked contrast to the vigorous profiles of
classic architecture. The impression, indeed, of the whole scheme of
decoration is rather one of soft richness, as carving melts into colour
and colour deepens and glows and finally passes into the gold or depths
of azure of the vaulting.
When the supply of antique columns was exhausted the Byzantine
architects began to imitate them, but soon departed from the classic
type. In certain cases the capital retained something of its derivation
from the Ionic or Corinthian styles; but gradually a new type was
evolved, which was distinguished by being convex to the outside rather
than concave. The motive appears to have been to give additional support
to the arch, for which purpose an _impost_ was, as the name implies,
“placed upon” the capital. It consists of a block, which projects beyond
the edges of the capital to fit the extra thickness of the wall and may
represent, as has been suggested, the survival of a part of the
architrave of the discarded entablature. In the decoration of the
capitals the foliage was sometimes enclosed in frames of interlace, or
the latter took the form of a basket, on which birds are perching.
=Pendentive Dome.=--We have now to consider the most characteristic
feature of Byzantine architecture--the Dome. Briefly, in the 200 years
that divided Justinian from Constantine the Byzantine architects
perfected a principle of dome construction by which they crowned a
square plan with the circle of a dome.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account