How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
To the Greeks æsthetics, the study of what is appreciated as beautiful
by the senses, was not a separate department of life, as it is apt to be
with us, but only another aspect of morality and religion. It was the
natural and inevitable expression of the inward spirit of the ideal. How
could a man’s life reach its highest possibility if it did not love and
seek after beauty; how could a city be truly great unless it were
manifestly beautiful?
One can hardly imagine a Hellen, who wished to retain any reputation for
intelligence, asserting, as many people are satisfied and even seem
proud to do in these days: “I don’t know anything about art, but I know
what I like.” To this it is on record that an artist retorted, “And so
does a cow.” Which would have been the sort of retort that a Hellen
might have made to the speaker, whom he would at once determine was a
person of low intelligence.
For Greek art, as we have already said, was not an expression solely of
the senses; but of the sensations guided by the intellect; and it was
just as much a part of a Greek’s intellectual training to know and
understand and feel--in a word, appreciate--art, as it was to fit
himself for other services to the State. Yet, do not forget it, the
Hellenes were a race of traders and manufacturers, like the backbone of
our communities to-day.
CHAPTER II
HELLENIC ARCHITECTURE
We have noted in the previous chapter that Hellenic art, like Hellenic
culture generally, was a product of the senses guided by the
intellect--the expression of intellectualised sensations. To his crude
sensations the artist applied very much the same process that the modern
scientist has applied to crude oil, until, through experiments guided by
observation and reasoning, he has developed refined oil, which gives the
purest and intensest possible illumination. Thus the Hellenic artists,
through generations, refined upon the forms of their architecture, to
create a unity, distinguished by fitness, proportion, harmony and
rhythm, until they brought it to the highest degree of expressional
capacity; appealing alike to feeling and to reason. It reached its
highest expression in the temple, the supreme monument of the
community’s civic consciousness.
The developed form of the Hellenic Temple resembled the Egyptian in
being a product of the “post and beam” principle of construction; but
differed in its purpose that the outside rather than the inside should
present superior dignity of design. The chief feature of the latter was
the Order, as it is called in Hellenic and Roman architecture, or
combination of columns and entablature. It might be confined to a
portico at the entrance or supplemented by another portico in the rear,
or still further extended by a colonnade that surrounded all
[Illustration: SOME TEMPLE PLANS P. 120
TEMPLE OF POSEIDON, PAESTUM. HEXASTYLE-PERIPTERAL
PARTHENON. OCTOSTYLE-PERIPTERAL
TEMPLE OF APOLLO, BASSÆ
DISTYLE IN ANTIS
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account