How to Study ArchitectureCaffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
History
How to Study Architecture
Caffin, Charles H. (Charles Henry)
Architecture -- History
=Ionic Order.=--From the grandiose simplicity of the Doric order we pass
to the slenderer and more graceful and decorated order of the Ionic. It
is almost like passing from a masculine to a feminine type: from a
reflection of the severe discipline of the old Dorian, as perpetuated by
the Spartans, to the more pleasure-loving and elegant life of the
wealthy Ionians; from the grave influence of the Olympian Zeus, chief
god of the Dorians, to the grace of the youthful Apollo and Artemis,
beloved of the Ionians.
For the Ionic order, as the name implies, was developed by the Asiatic
Hellenes whose migration from Armenia has been already noted. From them
the Greeks of Europe borrowed it. Among the earliest known examples are
a =Temple of Apollo= at =Naucratis=, in Egypt, and the archaic =Temple of
Artemis=, at =Ephesus=, both belonging to about 560 <small>B.C.</small> The remains of the
latter are in the British Museum. They include two capitals, inscribed
with the name of Crœsus, who is known to have contributed to the temple.
As in the Doric order, the Ionic temple rested on a _stylobate_ of three
steps, but the column is also provided with a base. The latter was
usually composed of two _tori_, of semi-circular profile, separated by
a concave moulding or _scotia_. Sometimes, as in the =Erechtheion= at
Athens, the base stood upon a square, flat base-block, or _plinth_.
Frequently the tori were embellished with horizontal flutings or the
interlacing wave-lines, called _guilloche_.
The Ionic shaft was proportionately higher than the Doric, being from 8
to 10 diameters in height as compared with the 4⅓ to 7 of the Doric.
Consequently, the entasis was less. The intercolumniation was sometimes
as much as two diameters. The shaft was incised with twenty-four narrow
flutings, separated by flat-edged fillets.
The capital usually commenced with a narrow convex moulding, called the
_astragal_, which was often enriched with the alternate bead and spool
ornament. Above this was the _echinus_, decorated with the egg-and-dart
pattern. But the _echinus_ is only partly visible, since it is
encroached upon by the main feature of the capital, a fillet that passes
across the face and at the sides winds inward upon itself, forming a
_volute_, which projects beyond the _echinus_. Above this was a low
_abacus_, enriched with ornament, on which set the _architrave_.
In some instances, as in the =Erechtheion=, the fillet forms a looping
curve, the volute is enriched with intermediate fillets and the necking
is decorated with the _anthemion_ ornament.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account